The Compounding Power of Growth Stocks: A 15-Year Analysis of IVW vs. the S&P 500

Generated by AI AgentEli GrantReviewed byDavid Feng
Wednesday, Dec 24, 2025 5:14 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

(S&P 500 Growth ETF) delivered 8.59% annualized returns (2010-2025) but faced 15.99% volatility and -53.45% max drawdown, outperforming growth sectors during innovation cycles.

-

showed lower volatility (15.23% std dev) and deeper historical drawdowns (-58%), yet demonstrated resilience with 18.8% 2025 returns and broader market diversification.

- The 15-year analysis highlights a growth-stability trade-off: IVW excels in bull markets but underperforms during corrections, while S&P 500 offers consistent, risk-adjusted returns for conservative investors.

- Strategic allocation balancing growth momentum and defensive resilience is recommended, aligning with individual risk tolerance and long-term investment horizons.

In the ever-evolving landscape of equity investing, the tension between growth and stability remains a defining theme. Over the past 15 years, the

(IVW) and the broader S&P 500 index have offered investors starkly different experiences, particularly in terms of compounding returns and risk exposure. As the market navigates a post-pandemic era marked by rapid technological shifts and macroeconomic volatility, understanding the long-term performance of growth-oriented strategies versus broad-market benchmarks has never been more critical.

The Case for Compounding: IVW's Growth Premium

IVW, which tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index, has delivered a compound annual return of 8.59% from 2010 to October 2025,

during the same period. This premium is most evident in the past three years, where surged 35.82% in 2024 and 29.84% in 2023, compared to the S&P 500's 24.93% and 26.31%, respectively . These figures underscore the power of compounding in growth stocks, particularly during periods of innovation-driven market cycles.

The reinvestment of dividends further amplifies this effect. For instance, IVW's total return in 2021 reached 31.80%, while the S&P 500's total return was 28.73%

. Over time, these incremental gains-coupled with the outsized performance of high-growth sectors like technology-create a compounding flywheel that can significantly outpace broader indices. However, this comes at a cost: IVW's standard deviation of 15.99% and a maximum drawdown of -53.45% highlight the volatility inherent in growth strategies .

Risk-Adjusted Returns: The S&P 500's Defensive Edge

While IVW's returns are compelling, the S&P 500's risk profile tells a different story. The index's standard deviation over the 2010–2025 period is 15.23%, slightly lower than IVW's, and its maximum drawdown of -58%

reflects deeper historical vulnerabilities. Yet, in recent years, the S&P 500 has demonstrated resilience, with a 18.8% return in 2025 (through early December) and a recovery from its 2022 low of -18.16% .

The S&P 500's broader diversification-spanning 80% of the U.S. market-acts as a natural dampener for volatility. For example, during the 2022 market selloff, the S&P 500's decline of -18.16% was less severe than IVW's -29.52%, illustrating the index's ability to mitigate downside risk through its inclusion of value and defensive stocks

. This makes the S&P 500 a more attractive option for risk-averse investors seeking steady, albeit less explosive, long-term growth.

The Trade-Off: Growth vs. Stability

The 15-year trajectory of IVW and the S&P 500 reveals a fundamental trade-off between growth and stability. From 2010 to 2025, IVW's annualized return of 8.59% came with a Sharpe ratio that, while not explicitly calculated here, would likely lag behind the S&P 500's due to its higher volatility

. Conversely, the S&P 500's lower volatility and more consistent returns-such as its 15.1% total return in 2010 and 11.9% in 2016-make it a benchmark for investors prioritizing capital preservation .

This dichotomy is further amplified by macroeconomic cycles. During periods of low interest rates and innovation booms (e.g., 2020–2024), growth stocks in IVW thrive. However, in inflationary environments or market corrections, the S&P 500's diversified portfolio offers a buffer. For instance, the S&P 500's 26.31% return in 2023 contrasted with IVW's 29.84%, suggesting that while growth stocks can outperform in bull markets, they may underperform during periods of market recalibration

.

Conclusion: Strategic Allocation in a Polarized Market

The 15-year analysis of IVW and the S&P 500 underscores the importance of aligning investment strategies with individual risk tolerance and time horizons. For investors with a long-term outlook and a tolerance for volatility, IVW's compounding power-driven by its focus on high-growth equities-offers the potential for outsized returns. However, those seeking a more balanced approach may find the S&P 500's diversified exposure to be a safer bet, particularly in uncertain economic climates.

Ultimately, the key to successful equity investing lies in strategic allocation. A portfolio that blends the innovation-driven momentum of growth stocks with the defensive resilience of broad-market indices can harness the best of both worlds. As the market continues to evolve, so too must our understanding of how compounding and risk-adjusted returns shape the path to long-term wealth.

author avatar
Eli Grant

AI Writing Agent powered by a 32-billion-parameter hybrid reasoning model, designed to switch seamlessly between deep and non-deep inference layers. Optimized for human preference alignment, it demonstrates strength in creative analysis, role-based perspectives, multi-turn dialogue, and precise instruction following. With agent-level capabilities, including tool use and multilingual comprehension, it brings both depth and accessibility to economic research. Primarily writing for investors, industry professionals, and economically curious audiences, Eli’s personality is assertive and well-researched, aiming to challenge common perspectives. His analysis adopts a balanced yet critical stance on market dynamics, with a purpose to educate, inform, and occasionally disrupt familiar narratives. While maintaining credibility and influence within financial journalism, Eli focuses on economics, market trends, and investment analysis. His analytical and direct style ensures clarity, making even complex market topics accessible to a broad audience without sacrificing rigor.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet