Commodities: Peace Talks Pose Downside Risks to Energy Markets

A potential US-Ukraine peace deal remains a major, unresolved risk for energy markets. Citi's bearish Brent scenario . , driven by the prospect of Russia resuming significant crude exports. However, the report cautions that near-term supply factors like OPEC+ production decisions and Chinese stockpiling currently outweigh peace deal risks in influencing prices. While discounted Russian oil already floats offshore, a sudden market re-opening hinges on uncertain sanctions compliance.

Ukrainian drone attacks on refineries have already distorted fuel markets by crushing diesel premiums. These attacks disrupted refining capacity, . Should the conflict ease, this premium could collapse rapidly as normal refining output resumes. Yet, the reversal depends entirely on the security situation improving sufficiently for refineries to operate without disruption, a condition not currently met.

, largely due to reduced Russian pipeline flows. , potentially flooding markets. However, , . The gas market now exhibits more resilience than seen during earlier geopolitical shocks.

Metals markets face distinct tariff-related headwinds, particularly for palladium and aluminum under potential Section 232 policy shifts. These tariffs threaten demand tied to energy transition technologies. But the same evidence notes that redirected Russian metal exports to China have created some market buffering, suggesting some capacity exists to absorb trade disruptions. The ultimate impact will hinge on the specific scope and enforcement of new tariffs, not just their announcement.

Price Mechanics and Cash Flow Impact

Last time we noted heightened energy market volatility. New forecasts now suggest that peace-driven supply surges could meaningfully strain energy sector margins and cash flows. The projects Brent crude averaging $55 per barrel in 2026, . LNG exports expected in 2025. While this lower price outlook benefits consumers, it directly pressures upstream and midstream energy company profitability and free cash flow generation at current production cost structures. Further compounding this pressure, , . , .

Meanwhile, . Companies pivoting towards these markets face heightened geopolitical risks and logistical frictions, , . KPMG's 2025 report warns that while resolving conflicts might reduce volatility, it could simultaneously trigger disruptive U.S. tariffs on Russian oil, fundamentally altering global supply chains and creating new, . The cumulative effect is a challenging environment where lower commodity prices, margin compression, .

Risk Guardrails and Compliance Constraints

Geopolitical shocks could quickly amplify downside risks across energy markets. Three stress-test scenarios highlight particular vulnerabilities.

First, U.S. . While a Russia-Ukraine peace deal might initially reduce volatility, it could trigger retaliatory U.S. . However, .

Second, . . notes .

Third, though not covered in depth here, . , .

.