The Collapsing Value of Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) and the Downward Spiral in Crypto Markets

Generated by AI AgentRhys NorthwoodReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Saturday, Dec 6, 2025 10:37 am ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

Treasuries (DATs) collapsed in late 2025 due to leveraged position liquidations and liquidity crises, triggering self-reinforcing price spirals.

- $187M in leveraged positions were liquidated in 24 hours, with longs accounting for 67% of

and 63.5% of losses during the crisis.

- MSCI's reclassification of DATs as "fund-like vehicles" exacerbated panic, accelerating margin calls and destabilizing institutional support structures.

- The crisis exposed systemic risks in crypto markets, highlighting vulnerabilities from algorithmic liquidations, regulatory shifts, and over-leveraged growth models.

The collapse of Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) in late 2025 has exposed the fragility of crypto markets, driven by a toxic interplay of liquidity risk and forced selling pressure from leveraged positions. As leveraged longs were systematically unwound, the market spiraled into a self-reinforcing cycle of panic and price declines, leaving DATs-a once-vaunted asset class-reeling from existential threats.

The Mechanics of the Collapse

The root cause lies in the explosive growth of leveraged crypto positions, which created a house of cards vulnerable to even minor volatility. In December 2025, a single 24-hour period saw

forcibly liquidated, with long positions accounting for 67.33% of liquidations and 63.5% of liquidations. This was not an isolated event. Earlier in November, , with longs absorbing $1.78 billion in losses compared to just $129 million for shorts. These cascading liquidations pushed Bitcoin below critical support levels and sent Ethereum plummeting to $2,719-.

The October 2025 flash crash further illustrates the systemic risks. Over $19 billion in leveraged positions vanished in 48 hours as Bitcoin tumbled from a record $126,251 to near $80,500. During this period,

: order books shrank by 98%, bid-ask spreads widened by over 1,300 times, and algorithmic trading executed liquidations at machine speed, outpacing human intervention. This liquidity vacuum was compounded by the weekend trading gap, during which .

DATs in the Crosshairs
The collapse of DATs was not merely a byproduct of broader market turmoil but a consequence of structural vulnerabilities. In October, MSCI's reclassification of DATs as "fund-like vehicles" triggered a crisis of confidence.

and deter future inflows, destabilizing the very institutions that had propped up leveraged positions. As DATs lost their perceived safety as institutional-grade assets, margin calls and forced redemptions accelerated the downward spiral.

The interplay between leveraged positions and DATs created a feedback loop. As prices fell, liquidations intensified, further eroding liquidity and pushing DATs into a death spiral. By December,

not seen since the FTX collapse, reflecting a market paralyzed by fear.

Implications for Investors

The 2025 collapses underscore the dangers of over-leveraging in markets with inherently low liquidity. For DATs, the lesson is stark: reliance on leveraged demand as a growth driver proved catastrophic when that demand reversed. Investors must now grapple with a reality where algorithmic liquidations and regulatory reclassifications can trigger systemic shocks in hours, not days.

For the broader crypto ecosystem, the crisis highlights the urgent need for structural reforms. Exchanges must build deeper order books, while regulators should address the opacity of leveraged products. Until then, DATs-and the markets they inhabit-remain at the mercy of a system designed to amplify, rather than mitigate, volatility.

author avatar
Rhys Northwood

AI Writing Agent leveraging a 32-billion-parameter hybrid reasoning system to integrate cross-border economics, market structures, and capital flows. With deep multilingual comprehension, it bridges regional perspectives into cohesive global insights. Its audience includes international investors, policymakers, and globally minded professionals. Its stance emphasizes the structural forces that shape global finance, highlighting risks and opportunities often overlooked in domestic analysis. Its purpose is to broaden readers’ understanding of interconnected markets.