The Collapse of Huione Pay and the Vulnerability of Stablecoins in Illicit Finance

Generated by AI AgentRiley SerkinReviewed byRodder Shi
Tuesday, Dec 2, 2025 8:00 pm ET3min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Huione Pay's 2025 collapse exposed stablecoin vulnerabilities exploited by illicit finance networks, processing $98B in crypto linked to scams and money laundering.

- Regulatory actions including Cambodia's license revocation and U.S. FinCEN's 311 designation crippled Huione, which laundered $4B via its

stablecoin.

- The crisis highlighted systemic risks in unregulated stablecoins, with USDH enabling $37M in North Korean cyberattack proceeds and $36M in scam funds to evade controls.

- The GENIUS Act now mandates 1:1 USD reserves for stablecoins and federal oversight, closing loopholes that allowed Huione's operations to thrive.

- Investors face heightened risks in unregulated stablecoins, with Huione's collapse demonstrating how liquidity crises and regulatory scrutiny can erase value overnight.

The collapse of Huione Pay in 2025 has exposed critical vulnerabilities in the stablecoin ecosystem, particularly its susceptibility to exploitation by illicit finance networks. As a subsidiary of the Cambodia-based Huione Group, Huione Pay operated a Telegram-based marketplace that

in cryptocurrency transactions, much of it linked to scams, cyber heists, and money laundering. The platform's failure-triggered by a liquidity crisis and regulatory crackdowns-has underscored the risks of unregulated stablecoin systems and the urgent need for robust compliance frameworks.

Operational Failures and Regulatory Crackdowns

Huione Pay's collapse was precipitated by a surge in withdrawal requests, which

and suspend operations for over a month. This liquidity crisis was compounded by years of regulatory scrutiny. In June 2024, Cambodia's central bank for violating financial regulations. By May 2025, the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as a foreign financial institution of primary money laundering concern under Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act, effectively cutting it off from the U.S. financial system. This move required U.S. banks to sever ties with Huione, a critical blow to its operations.

The platform's stablecoin, USDH, played a central role in its illicit activities. Pegged 1:1 to the U.S. dollar, USDH was designed to circumvent freezing mechanisms and transfer restrictions,

. FinCEN reported that the Huione Group laundered at least $4 billion in illicit proceeds between 2021 and 2025, including $37 million from North Korean cyberattacks and $36 million from investment scams . Exchanges like Upbit and OKX had already due to suspicious activity, signaling growing awareness of its risks.

Stablecoin Vulnerabilities in Illicit Finance

The USDH case highlights systemic weaknesses in stablecoin ecosystems. Unlike traditional banking systems, stablecoins often lack transparency in reserve backing and real-time transaction monitoring. Huione Pay's ability to process vast sums through USDH without adequate oversight demonstrates how bad actors can exploit these gaps. According to a report by the Financial Crime Central,

with organized crime networks, including North Korean cybercriminals and Southeast Asian fraud syndicates.

The collapse also revealed the fragility of user trust in unregulated platforms. When Huione Pay

, crowds gathered outside its Phnom Penh headquarters, fearing total loss of their funds. The company's proposed repayment plans-offering either 18-month high-yield investments or six-month partial withdrawals-further eroded confidence, as users questioned the viability of such long-term solutions . This crisis underscores the risks of relying on stablecoins without clear regulatory safeguards.

Regulatory Responses and the GENIUS Act

The U.S. response to Huione Pay's collapse has accelerated efforts to regulate stablecoins. The GENIUS Act of 2025,

, mandates that stablecoin issuers maintain 1:1 reserves in U.S. dollars or short-term Treasuries. It also without a federal charter from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). These measures aim to prevent arbitrage and ensure that stablecoins cannot be weaponized for illicit finance.

The Act's global implications are significant. Foreign issuers must now align with U.S. standards to operate in the American market,

entities like Huione to thrive. For instance, the Huione Group's designation under Section 311 has foreign stablecoin networks that fail to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) requirements. This regulatory tightening is expected to ripple across Asia and other regions where unregulated stablecoins have been prevalent.

Implications for Investors and the Stablecoin Ecosystem

For investors, the Huione Pay collapse serves as a stark reminder of the risks inherent in unregulated stablecoin ecosystems. The lack of transparency, coupled with the potential for regulatory intervention, creates a volatile environment where even seemingly stable assets can lose value overnight. As stated by the Brookings Institution,

and federal oversight is a step toward mitigating these risks, but compliance costs may deter smaller players.

Moreover, the incident highlights the importance of due diligence. Investors must scrutinize the regulatory compliance of stablecoin issuers and avoid platforms with opaque reserve structures. The Huione Group's history of laundering $4 billion in illicit funds

demonstrates that even large-scale operations can collapse under the weight of regulatory scrutiny and operational instability.

Conclusion

The collapse of Huione Pay is a cautionary tale for the stablecoin industry. It exposes the vulnerabilities of unregulated systems to exploitation by criminal networks and the catastrophic consequences of liquidity crises. While the GENIUS Act and FinCEN's actions represent progress in curbing these risks, the Huione case underscores the need for continuous innovation in AML frameworks and international cooperation. For investors, the lesson is clear: stability in stablecoins is not guaranteed without robust governance and regulatory alignment.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet