icon
icon
icon
icon
Upgrade
Upgrade

News /

Articles /

Chinese Students Sue U.S. Over Visa Revocations

Word on the StreetMonday, Apr 14, 2025 11:18 am ET
2min read

Four Chinese students studying at prestigious universities in the United States have initiated legal action against the U.S. government, alleging that their student visas were revoked without adequate notification or evidence. The lawsuit, filed on April 11 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, asserts that the government's actions violate the Administrative Procedure Act and the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs, who attend the University of California, Berkeley, and Carnegie Mellon University, are seeking a temporary restraining order to halt the government's actions and restore their student status.

The lawsuit is part of a larger initiative by the Trump administration to revoke the visas of international students and scholars, citing national security concerns. According to court documents and statements from lawyers, the administration has canceled the visas of at least 529 students, faculty, and researchers from 88 universities nationwide. The affected students and scholars are left in uncertainty, unsure whether they must leave the country immediately or if they can continue their studies.

The lawsuit alleges that the government's actions are arbitrary and capricious, and that the students were not given any notice or opportunity to be heard before their visas were revoked. The lawsuit also claims that the government's actions are discriminatory, as the majority of the students affected by the visa cancellations are from mainland China. The lawsuit seeks to have the government's actions declared unlawful and to have the students' visas restored.

The lawsuit is being handled by the law firm Deheng Law Offices, which has a history of successfully challenging the Trump administration's policies. The firm's managing partner, Kevin Ju, who is based in Silicon Valley, has been involved in several high-profile cases against the administration, including a successful challenge to the government's attempt to ban the popular Chinese messaging app WeChat. Ju has stated that the firm is seeking a temporary restraining order to halt the government's actions and restore the students' visas, and that the firm is hopeful that the court will rule in their favor.

This legal action is the latest in a series of challenges to the Trump administration's immigration policies, which have been criticized for being discriminatory and arbitrary. The administration has defended its actions, stating that they are necessary to protect national security and to combat what it describes as rampant anti-Semitism on college campuses. However, critics have argued that the administration's actions are motivated by xenophobia and a desire to reduce the number of immigrants in the country.

The lawsuit is also part of a broader effort by the Chinese government to protect the rights of its citizens studying and working abroad. In a statement, the Chinese Foreign Ministry urged the U.S. government to stop using national security as a pretext to discriminate against Chinese students and scholars, and to take steps to protect their legal rights. The ministry also called on the U.S. government to work with China to promote educational exchange and cooperation, which it described as being in the interests of both countries.

Disclaimer: The news articles available on this platform are generated in whole or in part by artificial intelligence and may not have been reviewed or fact checked by human editors. While we make reasonable efforts to ensure the quality and accuracy of the content, we make no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the truthfulness, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of any information provided. It is your sole responsibility to independently verify any facts, statements, or claims prior to acting upon them. Ainvest Fintech Inc expressly disclaims all liability for any loss, damage, or harm arising from the use of or reliance on AI-generated content, including but not limited to direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages.