China's Resurgence in Bitcoin Mining: Strategic and Security Implications for Global Infrastructure and U.S. Competitiveness

Generated by AI AgentPenny McCormerReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Saturday, Oct 25, 2025 1:21 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- China's underground Bitcoin miners defy 2021 ban, leveraging Sichuan hydropower and Xinjiang coal to maintain 14.05% global hashrate share.

- China controls 98% of Bitcoin ASIC production, raising cybersecurity risks via mandatory intelligence cooperation laws and potential hardware backdoors.

- U.S. miners pivot to AI computing amid halving losses, while federal policies emphasize supply chain transparency and state-level incentives for AI-focused operations.

- Geopolitical tensions escalate as China's semiconductor and shipbuilding dominance disrupts global trade, prompting U.S. calls for domestic production under CHIPS Act.

In 2025, China's mining sector has staged a quiet but significant comeback, defying its 2021 regulatory ban. Despite operating in a legal gray zone, underground miners in regions like Sichuan and Xinjiang leverage seasonal hydropower and surplus coal energy to maintain a 14.05% global hashrate share, ranking third behind the U.S. and Russia, according to a . This resurgence raises critical questions about energy transparency, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and the U.S.'s ability to compete in a geopolitically charged digital economy.

The Underground Infrastructure and Energy Paradox

China's mining operations thrive in remote areas where energy costs are low. Sichuan's hydroelectric plants, for instance, provide cheap power during the rainy season, while Xinjiang's coal and wind resources sustain year-round activity, according to a

. However, the opacity of these operations creates risks. A report by BeInCrypto highlights that China's energy mix remains dominated by coal-led by companies like China Shenhua Energy-despite growing renewable investments, as shown in . This duality complicates global assessments of Bitcoin's carbon footprint and exposes the network to geopolitical energy shocks.

ASIC Dominance and Cybersecurity Risks

China's control over 98% of Bitcoin ASIC production-primarily through Bitmain and TSMC-manufactured chips-grants it outsized influence over global mining infrastructure, according to a

. This dominance introduces cybersecurity risks. Chinese law mandates that companies cooperate with national intelligence agencies, raising concerns about potential backdoors in firmware or hardware, as discussed in . For example, that analysis warns that mining facilities near U.S. power grids or communication hubs could serve dual purposes, enabling covert data collection or sabotage, as .

The U.S. Treasury and CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States) have responded by proposing stricter cybersecurity protocols and supply chain transparency measures, according to Cointelegraph. Some experts advocate for a complete ban on Chinese ASICs in the U.S., mirroring restrictions on Huawei in telecom infrastructure, a position also reported by Cointelegraph.

U.S. Policy and the AI Pivot

Faced with China's resurgence and the 2024 Bitcoin halving's profit cuts, U.S. miners are pivoting to AI computing. CleanSpark, Marathon Digital, and

are repurposing their data centers and energy contracts to support AI workloads, capitalizing on the $1.3 trillion AI infrastructure boom, according to a . CleanSpark's Georgia data center project, for instance, leverages existing power infrastructure to reduce costs and time-to-profitability, the Carbon Credits report notes.

The Biden administration's 2025 Executive Order on crypto emphasizes cybersecurity collaboration and regulatory clarity, while states like Arizona and Oklahoma offer tax incentives to attract AI-focused mining firms, according to a

. Conversely, New York's proposed two-year moratorium on proof-of-work mining reflects growing environmental and security concerns, as Global Legal Insights discusses.

Geopolitical Tensions and Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

Beyond mining, China's influence extends to critical supply chains. The Dutch government's 2025 seizure of Nexperia-a Chinese-owned semiconductor firm-sparked retaliatory measures and disrupted auto production for Volkswagen, according to a

. Similarly, U.S.-China tensions in shipbuilding (China controls 53% of global shipyard output) highlight the fragility of global trade, as . These incidents underscore the need for domestic semiconductor production, as outlined in the CHIPS Act, to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers-a theme emphasized in coverage by Cointelegraph.

Investment Considerations

For investors, the interplay of these factors creates both risks and opportunities. China's hashrate resurgence and ASIC dominance pose long-term threats to Bitcoin's decentralization and security. However, U.S. miners adapting to AI and regulatory clarity could outperform peers. Jane Street Capital's $205 million investment in Bitcoin mining stocks like Hut 8 and Bitfarms signals confidence in the sector's resilience, according to a

.

Conclusion

China's Bitcoin mining resurgence is a double-edged sword: it underscores the sector's adaptability but also exposes systemic vulnerabilities. As the U.S. navigates regulatory, technological, and geopolitical challenges, the race to secure Bitcoin's infrastructure will hinge on balancing innovation with security. For now, the hashrate war-and the AI revolution it fuels-remains a defining battleground of the digital age.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet