China’s Inflation Data Deepens Policy Dilemma as PPI Sinks, CPI Barely Moves

China’s inflation report for June highlighted the fragile state of the world’s second-largest economy, as producer prices tumbled by their sharpest pace in nearly two years while consumer prices edged up only marginally. The latest figures, released Wednesday by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), revealed persistent deflationary pressures that are likely to test Beijing’s resolve and policy playbook amid global trade disruptions and domestic structural headwinds.

WATCH: How China Took the Market—and How the U.S. Gave It Away

The Producer Price Index (PPI) declined 3.6% year-over-year in June, exceeding the -3.2% drop expected in a Reuters poll and widening from May’s 3.3% contraction. This marked the steepest fall since July 2023 and extended the PPI’s deflation streak, which has been ongoing since September 2022. The drop reflects intense price competition, particularly in export-oriented industries, and underscores chronic overcapacity across several manufacturing sectors.

In contrast, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.1% year-over-year, modestly above expectations for a flat reading and reversing a four-month stretch of declines. Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, rose 0.7%—its fastest pace in 14 months—suggesting some stabilization in underlying demand, though still well below typical growth targets for a developing economy of China’s scale.

The divergence between weak producer prices and tepid consumer inflation reflects a deeper imbalance between supply and demand. Analysts attribute the brief uptick in consumer prices largely to a state-sponsored trade-in program that offered subsidies for purchases of appliances, electronics, and electric vehicles. However, this stimulus effect is likely to fade in the second half of the year unless more durable demand-side policies are introduced.

Zichun Huang of Capital Economics noted that, "with goods supply continuing to outpace demand, persistent overcapacity means price wars among manufacturers are likely to continue", further fueling disinflationary forces. The CPI rebound, while symbolically important, does little to alter the underlying narrative of weak domestic demand and corporate reluctance to invest.

Policymakers have taken notice. In a top-level economic policy meeting chaired by President Xi Jinping last week, Chinese leaders denounced excessive price competition and vowed to phase out outdated industrial capacity. State media echoed these themes, calling for businesses to improve product quality rather than slash prices. Industrial profits plunged 9.1% in May, the worst reading since October 2023, and serve as a warning about the limits of cost-cutting as a business strategy.

The call to reduce “disorderly” competition and cut “backward” production capacity is reminiscent of supply-side reforms enacted a decade ago. Those measures—such as shuttering inefficient steel mills and reducing housing oversupply in smaller cities—ultimately helped lift producer prices in 2016. But today’s challenges are more complex. According to HSBC economists, the current pressures are “more broad-based,” with the property sector in decline, consumer confidence still fragile, and industrial investment slowing, particularly in high-growth sectors like electric vehicles and lithium-ion batteries.

China’s subdued inflation also gives the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) more room to ease monetary policy, though analysts say the central bank remains cautious. Lynn Song, ING’s chief China economist, sees room for another interest rate cut in Q4, citing the combination of soft activity data and benign inflation. However, the absence of a strong consumption rebound and Beijing’s concern about capital outflows may temper any aggressive easing.

On the global stage, China’s deepening producer deflation may have spillover effects. With prices falling at the factory gate, Chinese exporters may be incentivized to offload excess supply abroad, raising the risk of a new wave of disinflation in global goods markets. This could complicate the inflation-fighting efforts of central banks in the U.S. and Europe, especially as Trump-era tariffs and the latest round of trade threats increase the volatility of global pricing.

China’s export growth, while surprisingly resilient in April and May, is unlikely to hold up under sustained tariff pressure. New levies on copper, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals announced by President Trump—and the looming August 1 deadline for reciprocal tariffs—are casting a long shadow. NBS statistician Dong Lijuan acknowledged that “uncertainty in the global trade environment has affected the export expectations of enterprises,” with weaker new orders and hiring already evident in factory surveys.

Market reactions to the data were measured. The CSI 300 index gained 0.19%, while the Shanghai Composite rose 0.3%. In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng declined 0.7%, reflecting ongoing concerns about China’s growth trajectory and mounting trade tensions.

Looking forward, attention now turns to the Communist Party’s high-level economic meeting later this month, where leaders are expected to unveil the macro policy roadmap for the second half of 2025. Economists hope this will include a more robust mix of fiscal spending and targeted stimulus to counteract deflationary inertia. Without a meaningful policy pivot, analysts warn China risks becoming trapped in a cycle of stagnant prices, weak demand, and underwhelming growth.