Chief Justice Roberts Temporarily Removes FTC Commissioner Slaughter, Indicating Court Support for Trump’s Agency Reorganization

In a significant move with potential implications for regulatory independence, Chief Justice John Roberts has temporarily removed Democratic Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Commissioner . This action, taken in September 2025, is seen as a clear signal of the Supreme Court’s inclination to support former President ’s efforts to exert control over the agency.

The decision reflects a broader judicial trend that has increasingly favored limiting the power of independent regulatory bodies. By temporarily sidelining Slaughter, who had been a key figure in pushing for aggressive and consumer protection measures, the Court has aligned itself with the administration's strategy to reshape the ’s direction.

This action is not an outright removal or a final determination of Slaughter’s status. Rather, it is a procedural step that opens the door for further legal and political maneuvering. The temporary nature of the ouster allows for the possibility of appeal or reversal, yet it nonetheless conveys a strong message to both the FTC and the broader regulatory community.

The move is widely interpreted as a nod to the ’s campaign to reassert executive influence over the FTC, an agency that has operated with a degree of independence from presidential control. The administration has long argued that the FTC's leadership has overstepped its and acted in ways that are inconsistent with the agency’s original mission.

Slaughter’s removal, while temporary, aligns with a broader pattern of in regulatory matters. Recent rulings have chipped away at the perceived autonomy of agencies like the FTC, often through decisions that emphasize the need for clearer legislative mandates and stricter executive oversight.

The implications of this decision are likely to ripple through the regulatory landscape. With the Supreme Court signaling openness to limiting the independence of agencies, the FTC’s future strategy may face greater scrutiny and potential constraints. The ruling could also embolden future administrations to challenge agency independence more directly.

This action by the Court underscores the evolving relationship between the judiciary and executive branches in shaping regulatory policy. While the FTC has traditionally maintained a level of insulation from political cycles, the temporary removal of a sitting commissioner signals a shift in that dynamic.

Ultimately, the Court’s decision not only affects Slaughter personally but also sends a clear message about the legal and political boundaries within which the FTC can operate. As the administration moves forward with its broader agenda to reshape the agency, this judicial development is poised to influence the trajectory of antitrust enforcement and consumer protection policies in the months ahead.

{}