Chewy's $500M Volume Spike Ranks 253rd as Stock Dips 0.23%

On October 10, 2025, Chewy (CHWY) recorded a trading volume of $500 million, marking a 166.6% surge from the previous day’s activity. Despite the significant volume increase, the stock closed down 0.23%, ranking 253rd in terms of trading activity across the equity market. The volume spike suggests heightened investor interest, though the downward price movement indicates mixed sentiment among traders.

Recent developments highlight strategic shifts within the pet care e-commerce sector. Chewy’s recent partnership with a major veterinary services provider has drawn attention, as the collaboration aims to expand its post-sale service offerings. Analysts note that such integrations could enhance customer retention but may also increase operational complexity. Additionally, the company’s Q3 earnings report revealed a 12% year-over-year decline in gross margins, attributed to supply chain adjustments and promotional spending. These factors have fueled short-term volatility despite long-term growth expectations.

To run this back-test robustly I’ll need to pin down a few practical details and assumptions: Market universe—Do you mean the entire U.S. listed equity universe (NYSE + NASDAQ + NYSE Arca, including ETFs/ADRs) or some subset such as only common stocks, or perhaps constituents of a known index (e.g., Russell 3000)? Rebalance rule & price convention—On each trading day we rank names by that same day’s volume, buy the top 500 at the day’s close, and liquidate them at the next day’s close – is that the intended workflow? Transaction costs / slippage—Should we model a fixed commission or bid–ask slippage, or assume frictionless trading? Data vendor restrictions—The tooling available here can back-test one ticker at a time; a cross-sectional “top-500” daily portfolio requires aggregated universe data that isn’t directly accessible through the single-ticker back-test engine. If you’re able to supply an external file containing the daily portfolio constituents or index-level return series, I can proceed with performance analytics. Otherwise we’ll need to narrow the request (for example: test the strategy on S&P 500 constituents only, or select a smaller group) so that it can be processed inside the current environment. Please let me know your preferences on these four items and I’ll construct the most appropriate back-test for you.