CFTC Unveils $6.8M Penalty as Crypto Fraudsters Target Community Trust Networks

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Friday, Sep 26, 2025 2:53 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- CFTC penalized Tennessee couple $6.8M for a $6.5M crypto fraud targeting 145 investors via a fake "Blessings of God Thru Crypto" platform mimicking Apex Trading.

- The scheme diverted $4M to an illegitimate overseas exchange and $2.6M to personal use, returning only $855K in a Ponzi-like structure.

- Griffises must pay $5.5M restitution and face lifetime bans from commodity trading, reflecting CFTC's intensified focus on crypto scams exploiting community trust networks.

- Experts warn of red flags like unregistered platforms and unrealistic returns, urging investors to diversify holdings across exchanges and hardware wallets.

- The case highlights systemic crypto risks, with regulators escalating enforcement against fraudulent operators to protect retail investors amid market instability.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has imposed a $6.8 million penalty on Tennessee couple Michael and Amanda Griffis for orchestrating a fraudulent cryptocurrency trading scheme that defrauded 145 investors of $6.5 million. The couple operated the "Blessings of God Thru Crypto" commodity pool from 2021 to 2023, using a fake platform designed to mimic the legitimate Apex Trading Platform. Investors were misled into believing their funds would generate high returns through crypto futures trading, guided by an enigmatic figure known as "Coach Wendy," whose identity remains unknown to authorities [1]. The scheme involved transferring over $4 million to an illegitimate overseas exchange, while the remaining funds were used for personal expenses, including luxury purchases and debt repayment. Only $855,000 was returned to victims in a Ponzi-style structure [2].

The CFTC’s consent order mandates that the Griffises pay $5.5 million in restitution to victims and a $1.35 million civil penalty. The court also barred them from future commodity trading or CFTC registration, imposing lifetime bans to prevent further violations of federal commodity laws [3]. The scheme exploited the couple’s real estate connections to recruit investors, leveraging their local credibility to gain trust. The CFTC emphasized that the case reflects a broader trend of fraudsters targeting community networks, including recent convictions of a Denver pastor and a Long Island man for similar crypto-linked scams [1].

The Griffises’ platform, which falsely claimed to use the Apex system, was engineered to mimic an overseas exchange. Investigators found no legitimate company details tied to the exchange, a red flag highlighted by Karan Pujara, founder of scam defense platform ScamBuzzer. Pujara noted that fraudsters often prioritize rapid capital extraction before authorities intervene, and once funds are moved across borders, recovery becomes improbable. He advised investors to diversify holdings across multiple exchanges and hardware wallets to mitigate risks, a strategy he said helped some participants limit losses [1].

The case underscores vulnerabilities in crypto markets, where even regulated platforms can fail investors. The collapse of FTX, a licensed exchange that misused customer funds, illustrates the sector’s systemic risks. Pujara stressed that while institutional actors can provide safeguards, individual investors must remain vigilant for signs of fraud, such as unregistered platforms or overly optimistic profit promises [1]. The Griffises’ scheme aligns with a pattern of crypto-related frauds exploiting trust, particularly in communities where personal relationships are leveraged to obscure criminal intent.

The CFTC’s enforcement action is part of an intensified regulatory focus on crypto scams, with agencies like the SEC and Department of Justice pursuing similar cases. The Griffises’ penalties join a growing list of judgments against fraudulent operators, reflecting regulators’ efforts to stabilize the market and protect retail investors. As the industry grapples with evolving risks, the case highlights the need for robust due diligence and regulatory oversight to curb exploitative practices [1].

Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet