CeriBell Outlook: A Weak Technical Profile and Mixed Analyst Signals

Generated by AI AgentData DriverReviewed byTianhao Xu
Sunday, Nov 23, 2025 7:14 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

(CBLL.O) shows weak technical indicators with a 1.0 diagnostic score, signaling high bearish risk.

- Analysts are divided: TD Cowen and

are optimistic, while remains bearish.

- Mixed fund flows reveal cautious institutional investors (48.93% outflow) versus limited retail optimism.

- Overbought RSI/WR indicators (5-day streak) suggest exhausted momentum and likely correction.

- Weak fundamentals (-59.61% NPM, -43.06% profit growth) reinforce caution for potential investors.

Market SnapshotTakeaway: (CBLL.O) is currently exhibiting a weak technical profile with bearish signals dominating and an internal diagnostic score of 1.0, suggesting caution for investors.

News HighlightsRecent Developments: Stanford Health Care will receive $424.9 million from a municipal bond sale to fund healthcare projects. This could indirectly influence investor sentiment in the broader healthcare sector. Amazon is making inroads into the health care space, launching a new marketplace startup. This signals increased competition and innovation in the industry. Vocational nursing provider The Nurse Academy has partnered with Uwill to boost mental health support for students, potentially addressing burnout and improving workforce readiness in healthcare.

Analyst Views & FundamentalsCeriBell has attracted attention from three institutions in the past 20 days, with simple average rating of 4.67 and a weighted performance-based rating of 1.84. The ratings show divergence, with TD Cowen and JP Morgan being optimistic while Raymond James is more bearish.

Price Trend vs. Ratings: The stock has risen by 29.54% recently, but the analyst ratings are broadly pessimistic, indicating a potential mismatch between market action and expectations. This inconsistency suggests caution for investors.

Key Fundamental Factors and Model Scores (Internal Diagnostic Scores 0-10): Total operating revenue (YoY growth rate %): 37.03% (Internal score: 3) PCF (Price to Cash Flow): -13.72 (Internal score: 1) Inventory turnover ratio: 1.18 (Internal score: 2) Total profit (YoY growth rate %): -43.06% (Internal score: 0) Cash-UP: 53.36% (Internal score: 2) NPM (Net Profit Margin): -59.61% (Internal score: 0) Interest coverage ratio (EBIT / Interest expense %): -26.93% (Internal score: 1) CFOA (Cash Flow from Operations per Share): -0.15 (Internal score: 1) Asset-MV (Asset Market Value %): -44.29% (Internal score: 0)

Money-Flow TrendsCeriBell's fund flow patterns show a mixed picture. While small investor flows are positive, with an inflow ratio of 50.35%, medium, large, and extra-large investors are all seeing negative inflow trends (48.86%, 48.81%, and 49.01% respectively). The overall inflow ratio is 48.95%, and the block trend is negative at 48.93%. This suggests that big-money investors are cautious, while retail investors may be showing limited optimism.

Key Technical SignalsCeriBell’s technical indicators are highly bearish. The RSI and WR indicators are both in overbought territory, with internal diagnostic scores of 1.0 and 1.0 respectively (10 being best), signaling weak momentum and a high risk of decline.

Recent Indicators by Date (Last 5 Days): 2025-11-17: WR Overbought 2025-11-18: WR Overbought 2025-11-19: WR Overbought 2025-11-20: WR Overbought 2025-11-21: WR Overbought and RSI Overbought

This repeated overbought pattern suggests exhaustion of the recent upward move and increased likelihood of a correction.Key Insights: The technical side is weak, and it is suggested to avoid the stock. Bearish signals are clearly dominant (2 bearish vs 0 bullish), indicating a poor trend quality.

ConclusionInvestors in CeriBell (CBLL.O) should proceed with caution. The stock is currently showing a weak technical setup with strong bearish indicators and an internal diagnostic technical score of 1.0. Analysts are divided, with some optimistic predictions from JP Morgan and TD Cowen, but poor historical performance from Raymond James. Given the mismatch between analyst ratings and the recent price rise, and the weak technical signals, consider waiting for a pull-back before considering entry into this stock.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet