"Centralized Promises, Collapsed Trust: How Celsius Betrayed Crypto’s Future"

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Wednesday, Sep 3, 2025 3:21 am ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Celsius Network, a top crypto lender, collapsed in 2022 after offering unsustainable 17% APYs and risky DeFi investments.

- Freezing withdrawals triggered a $4.7B liquidity crisis, bankrupting the platform and harming 1.7M users.

- Regulators and courts exposed Celsius's Ponzi-like practices, leading to founder Alex Mashinsky's 2023 fraud charges.

- The collapse exposed CeFi risks, emphasizing transparency gaps, custodial vulnerabilities, and unrealistic yield dangers.

Celsius Network, once hailed as a revolutionary force in the cryptocurrency lending space, has become emblematic of the risks inherent in centralized finance (CeFi). Launched in 2017 by Alex Mashinsky, the platform quickly rose to prominence by offering high annual percentage yields (APYs) of up to 17% on crypto deposits, zero fees, and a user-friendly interface that appealed to both retail and institutional investors. By 2021,

had amassed over $25 billion in assets under management, making it one of the largest players in the CeFi sector [1]. The platform’s native CEL token was designed to enhance user benefits, including boosted yields and priority access to loans, further attracting a loyal community [1].

However, the foundation of Celsius’s business model was fraught with instability. Internal documents and subsequent investigations revealed that the company engaged in speculative trading, overleveraged user deposits, and lacked adequate risk management practices. A significant portion of user funds was deployed into high-risk DeFi protocols, such as Anchor Protocol on the Terra blockchain, which offered unsustainable returns. When Terra collapsed in May 2022, Celsius suffered a major blow to its liquidity. Additionally, Celsius used customer assets to prop up the price of its CEL token, a strategy that backfired when the market turned [1]. These practices, combined with the lack of transparency, eroded trust among users and regulators alike.

The breaking point came on June 12, 2022, when Celsius froze all withdrawals and transfers, citing a liquidity crisis. This event triggered a cascade of panic across the crypto market and led to the filing of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition just weeks later. The company revealed a $1.2 billion shortfall in its balance sheet, and over 1.7 million users found themselves locked out of their accounts. The total amount owed to users was estimated at around $4.7 billion, leading to widespread financial distress and legal repercussions [1]. The collapse of Celsius not only devastated its users but also accelerated the downfall of other centralized lenders such as Voyager and BlockFi, contributing to a broader crisis of trust in the CeFi sector.

The fallout extended beyond financial losses. Multiple U.S. state regulators launched investigations into Celsius, and federal agencies such as the SEC, CFTC, and DOJ pursued civil and criminal actions. In July 2023, Mashinsky was arrested and charged with wire fraud, securities fraud, and market manipulation. A court-appointed examiner later released a 600+ page report that characterized Celsius’s operations as resembling a Ponzi scheme, with executives using new deposits to pay off earlier obligations [1]. The report also highlighted the company’s internal opacity, including executives selling millions in CEL tokens while encouraging the public to hold onto them.

The Celsius case has underscored several critical lessons for the crypto industry. First, the reliance on custodial models exposes users to significant risks, as demonstrated by the adage “Not your keys, not your coins.” Second, the distinction between centralized and decentralized finance is crucial, as centralized platforms often lack the transparency and auditability of DeFi protocols. Third, unsustainably high yields are a red flag that should not be ignored. Finally, tokenomics should not be used to mask solvency issues, as the overuse of utility tokens can create artificial demand that eventually collapses [1].

In conclusion, Celsius Network’s collapse serves as a cautionary tale for the crypto industry. The company’s promise of financial freedom was undermined by its unsustainable business practices and lack of transparency. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies and legal actions unfold, the Celsius case highlights the need for robust governance, risk management, and accountability in the management of user funds. The hope is that the lessons learned from this debacle will prevent similar incidents in the future and foster a more resilient and transparent crypto ecosystem.

Source:

[1] Celsius Network — Promised the Future, Delivered Chaos Instead (https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/celsius-network-promised-the-future-delivered-chaos-instead/)

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet