Central Banks Caution on Stablecoin Dangers, Coinbase Argues Safety

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byDavid Feng
Sunday, Nov 23, 2025 9:12 am ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Central banks warn stablecoins pose systemic risks, citing potential global instability from mass redemptions and liquidity crises.

- BIS and ECB highlight risks of rapid stablecoin reserve liquidation, comparing dangers to 2008 crisis and recent crypto market shocks.

-

defends stablecoins as safer than , citing full-reserve government bond backing and lower credit risk.

- Regulators remain divided: ECB demands preemptive oversight while Fed officials praise stablecoins as misunderstood innovation.

- Market projections show stablecoin value could surge to $2-3 trillion by 2030, intensifying debates over financial stability vs. innovation.

The growing dominance of stablecoins has sparked warnings from central banks about potential systemic risks, with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and European Central Bank (ECB) cautioning that a mass redemption event could trigger global financial instability. Meanwhile, crypto exchanges like

argue stablecoins are safer than traditional banking systems.

Central banks are increasingly concerned that stablecoins-digital tokens pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar-could become systemically important, mirroring the risks seen during the 2008 financial crisis.

, and ECB Governing Council member, warned that a sudden loss of confidence in stablecoins could lead to fire-sales of U.S. Treasury bonds, forcing central banks to rethink monetary policy. "If stablecoins are that stable, you could end up in a situation where the underlying assets need to be sold quickly," Sleijpen said, .

The BIS echoed these concerns in a June 2025 report,

could trigger large-scale redemptions, disrupting the U.S. Treasury market. The report highlighted that stablecoin reserves, often held in short-term government bonds, could face rapid liquidation during a crisis, exacerbating volatility in global bond markets. This risk is amplified by the explosive growth of the sector, by 2030.

Historical parallels are already drawing attention. following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank demonstrated how real-world financial shocks can ripple into crypto markets. Similarly, of 100% tariffs on Chinese goods triggered a $20 billion crypto market selloff in a single day, underscoring how geopolitical tensions can destabilize digital assets. that such volatility could accelerate stablecoin adoption in ways that undermine central bank control over monetary policy.

Coinbase, however, has pushed back against these warnings.

, Faryar Shirzad, argued that stablecoins are inherently safer than traditional banking due to their full-reserve backing and liquidity. "Banks make long-term, often risky loans to private individuals and corporations, which exposes them to both credit and liquidity risks. In contrast, stablecoin issuers typically hold short-term government bonds, which are virtually risk-free and highly liquid," Shirzad said.

Regulators remain divided. While the ECB and BIS emphasize the need for preemptive oversight,

an "innovation" that has been unfairly stigmatized. The debate reflects broader tensions between financial innovation and stability, as stablecoin usage grows from $310 billion today to .

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet