Celestica Plunges 1.62 as $520M Volume Dumps It to 191st in Trading Activity

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Friday, Sep 12, 2025 8:52 pm ET1min read
CLS--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Celestica’s stock fell 1.62% to $12.33 on Sept. 12, 2025, with a $520M trading volume, a 34.04% drop from the prior session.

- Strategic operational streamlining and Asian supply chain disruptions raised near-term execution risks, driving the sell-off.

- The stock fell below its 50-day average, with increased put options, but long-term holders focus on a $1.5B share repurchase program.

Celestica (CLS) closed on Sept. 12, 2025, , marking its lowest price in over a month. , , . The reduced liquidity ranked it 191st in terms of trading activity among listed equities on the day.

Recent developments highlight shifting investor sentiment toward Celestica’s near-term outlook. A strategic update from the company earlier this week outlined plans to streamline operations in underperforming manufacturing hubs, . Meanwhile, supply chain disruptions in Asia—specifically delayed component deliveries from key suppliers—have raised concerns about potential production bottlenecks in Q4. These factors collectively contributed to the sell-off, as traders priced in near-term execution risks.

Technical indicators suggest short-term pressure remains intact. . , reflecting heightened bearish positioning. However, , .

To run a formal back-test we need to translate your idea (“buy the 500 most-actively-traded stocks each day, hold one day”) into something the platform’s engines can execute. A couple of key points need clarification: 1. UniverseUPC-- • Do you want all U.S. listed common stocks (NYSE / NASDAQ / AMEX) or a different universe (e.g., only S&P 500 constituents)? 2. Trade mechanicsMCHB-- • Entry price: buy at the same-day close, or at the next-day open after we know the ranking? • Exit price: sell next-day close (i.e., one full trading day), or something else? 3. Frictional costs • Should we assume zero commission/slippage, or do you have cost assumptions? Just as important: the current back-testing engine exposed in this chat is designed for single-ticker strategies or event-based tests. A daily re-balanced 500-stock portfolio is technically possible, but it requires a different multi-asset engine that isn’t yet wired into this interface. I can: A. Walk you through a high-level, approximate performance calculation (outside the toolset), or B. Help you reformulate the test into something the engine supports (e.g., event test on a single ETF or on individual tickers), or C. Queue this as a multi-asset portfolio test for an offline run (takes longer but produces full portfolio metrics). Let me know which pathPATH-- (and the trade details above) fits your needs best, and we’ll proceed accordingly.

Busca aquellos activos que tengan un volumen de transacciones explosivo.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet