U.S. CBDC Stalemate: Privacy Fears Clash With Global Momentum

U.S. lawmakers remain deeply divided over the development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), with privacy concerns and political motivations shaping the debate. Recent legislative moves, including the House’s passage of the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act in July, reflect growing fears among some lawmakers that a U.S. digital dollar could compromise civil liberties. Representative Tom Emmer, the bill’s sponsor, warned that a CBDC without robust privacy protections could enable federal surveillance and restrict everyday financial transactions. However, policy experts argue that such concerns are often overstated and politically driven, with the Federal Reserve emphasizing that any CBDC would require explicit Congressional approval and could incorporate privacy safeguards.

The U.S. stance contrasts with other major economies, including China, which has already launched its digital yuan, and the European Union, which is in the pilot phase for its digital euro. According to Sheila Warren, CEO of the Project Liberty Institute, the U.S. is diverging from global trends, with its current Congress and administration adopting a firm anti-CBDC position. Warren distinguishes between wholesale and retail CBDCs, noting that the former—used for interbank settlements—makes sense, while the latter, intended for consumer use, is less compelling. She argues that the debate over a digital dollar is increasingly overshadowed by the rapid growth of stablecoins, which could serve as the “jet fuel” of the digital economy.

The recent passage of the GENIUS Act in the U.S. aims to regulate stablecoins by requiring full backing with cash or short-term Treasury bonds and prohibiting stablecoin issuers from offering interest on token holdings. However, the law still allows crypto exchanges to provide incentives to stablecoin holders, creating a potential regulatory loophole. Banking industry groups have raised concerns that this could encourage depositors to move funds from traditional banks to less-regulated crypto platforms, potentially undermining financial stability. Meanwhile, proponents argue that stablecoins offer benefits such as faster, lower-cost transactions and broader financial inclusion, particularly in emerging markets.

Privacy concerns surrounding CBDCs are not unique to the U.S. In the European Union, lawmakers have expressed skepticism over the digital euro, questioning how user data would be handled and whether central bank-issued accounts could undercut commercial banks. ECB board member Piero Cipollone has emphasized that a digital euro would complement cash and ensure a reliable payment method during crises such as cyberattacks or network outages. However, critics argue that the move could reduce consumer trust in traditional banking and centralize control over financial transactions. The ECB aims to finalize the legal framework for the digital euro by the second quarter of 2026, with a potential launch by 2029.

As the global CBDC landscape evolves, the U.S. remains cautious, while other nations advance with pilots and broader adoption strategies. The Federal Reserve has not made a final decision on a retail CBDC and continues to assess the potential risks and benefits. Meanwhile, the debate over privacy, financial stability, and the role of central banks in the digital age continues to shape policy discussions in Washington and beyond.

Source:

[1] CBDC debate continues in the U.S. as Congress returns from recess (https://cointelegraph.com/news/cbdc-debate-continues-in-the-u-s-as-congress-returns-from-recess)

[2] How will digital currencies impact banks? - The TwentyFour Blog (https://blog.twentyfouram.com/insights/how-will-digital-currencies-impact-banks)

[3] The Loophole Turning Stablecoins Into a Trillion-Dollar Fight (https://www.wired.com/story/genius-act-loophole-stablecoins-banks/)

[4] EU lawmakers skeptical of digital euro as ECB renews pitch (https://cointelegraph.com/news/digital-euro-ecb-lawmakers-privacy-risks)

[5] The debate over CBDCs overstates both their promise and ... (https://www.americanbanker.com/opinion/cbdcs-are-neither-the-threat-nor-the-panacea-that-many-believe)

[6] The Death of Cash — How CBDCs Could Reshape Global Power (https://medium.com/@sumitbhardwaj1357/the-death-of-cash-how-cbdcs-could-reshape-global-power-149fd214ed10)