CBA's AI Bot Boosts Calls, Not Job Cuts

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) has rescinded plans to cut 45 customer service roles that were initially attributed to the implementation of artificial intelligence technology. The reversal came after the Finance Sector Union (FSU) raised concerns at the Fair Work Commission, alleging the bank had misrepresented the impact of its AI voice-bot on workload and employee redundancy [1]. CBA admitted it had made an error in its initial assessment, stating it “did not adequately consider all relevant business considerations” when announcing the redundancies [2].

According to the FSU, the introduction of the AI voice-bot had the opposite effect of reducing call volumes. Instead, call numbers increased, forcing CBA to offer staff overtime and even repurpose team leaders to handle customer inquiries. This directly contradicted the bank’s earlier claims that automation would streamline operations and reduce the need for customer service staff. CBA spokespersons now acknowledge the miscalculation and have extended three options to affected employees: remain in their current positions, seek redeployment within the bank, or depart voluntarily [1].

The union has hailed the reversal as a “major win,” with FSU national secretary Julia Angrisano condemning the attempt to use AI as a “cover for job cuts.” She emphasized that workers have experienced increased workloads rather than reduced ones, and the union continues to gather testimonies regarding the impact of automation and offshoring ahead of an upcoming Fair Work hearing [1]. The FSU also criticized CBA for “dressing up job cuts as innovation,” highlighting the need for greater transparency in workforce planning.

CBA CEO Matt Comyn previously stated that the long-term impact of AI on jobs remains difficult to predict, noting that while some tasks may be automated, employees tend to transition to higher-value work over time. However, the bank has also expanded its technology workforce, including hiring around 2,000 additional staff in recent months, most of whom are based in India [1]. Despite this, the FSU has continued to scrutinize how such technological shifts affect job security and working conditions.

CBA’s decision to reverse its AI-related job cuts underscores the growing tension between automation initiatives and workforce stability in the financial sector. With the bank reporting a record $10.25 billion cash profit for the 2025 financial year, the immediate financial implications of the reversal are considered minimal. However, the incident has prompted the bank to review its internal processes to prevent similar errors in future decision-making [1].

The situation also highlights broader concerns about the deployment of AI in customer service roles. Globally, financial institutions are navigating the dual challenge of leveraging technology for efficiency while managing the human cost of automation. CBA’s recent partnership with OpenAI to integrate advanced AI into its operations demonstrates its commitment to technological advancement, but the episode with the voice-bot illustrates the importance of aligning such strategies with real-world operational outcomes and employee realities [2].

Source:

[1] Commonwealth Bank backtracks on AI job cuts, apologises ... (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-21/cba-backtracks-on-ai-job-cuts-as-chatbot-lifts-call-volumes/105679492)

[2] Australia's Biggest Bank Reverses Plan to Replace Jobs ... (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-21/commonwealth-bank-reverses-job-cuts-decision-over-ai-chatbots)