Caterpillar’s $0.79B Volume Ranks 135th as Institutional Investors Cut Holdings Amid Analyst Price Hikes and Insider Sales

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Monday, Sep 8, 2025 8:58 pm ET1min read
CAT--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Caterpillar's $0.79B trading volume ranked 135th as institutional investors cut holdings, including a 36.7% reduction by Advisors Asset Management.

- Analysts raised CAT's price target to $520 (JPMorgan) amid a 1.4% dividend yield, while insiders sold $8.94M in shares over 90 days.

- The company maintains 70.98% institutional ownership and a 1.41 beta, with Energy & Transportation segment growth offsetting 2025 tariff risks.

- Strategic shifts toward high-margin services and digital solutions aim to mitigate cyclical risks in construction/mining sectors.

On September 8, 2025, , ranking 135th in market activity, . Institutional investors reduced holdings, , while new positions were added by smaller funds. Analysts revised CAT’s price targets, , maintaining an “overweight” rating. , , .

Caterpillar’s market position remains robust despite short-term headwinds. , with mixed activity from hedge funds and private wealth managers. Analyst sentiment is positive, . However, insider sales, , highlight internal caution. The company’s Energy & Transportation segment, driven by AI data center demand, is positioned as a long-term growth catalyst, though 2025 are expected to weigh on profitability.

, , . , . Strategic shifts toward high-margin services and digital solutions aim to offset cyclical risks in construction and mining. Analysts emphasize the company’s scale-driven cost advantages and global service network as key differentiators amid competitive pressures.

I can certainly help you design and evaluate that strategy, but before we proceed I need to clarify two practical details to be sure the back-test we run matches what you have in mind and is technically feasible with the back-testing engine we have available: 1. UniverseUPC-- definition • Do you want to rank every U.S. listed stock (NYSE + NASDAQ + Amex) by daily dollar volume, or a more limited universe such as the S&P 500 constituents? • Should ADRs, ETFs, and penny stocks (< $1) be included or excluded? 2. Engine capability Our current back-test engine supports single-ticker or single-index simulations. To replicate a “Top-500-by-volume” long-only portfolio we have two practical work-arounds: a) Use a pre-constructed index/ETF that tracks high-liquidity stocks (e.g., an equal-weight high-liquidity index) if one exists and back-test that single ticker. b) Run the analysis off-platform (outside the chat) to build the daily Top-500 basket and feed the resulting portfolio P&L series back into the engine. Please let me know: • Which universe definition you prefer. • Whether you are comfortable approximating the strategy with a single index/ETF, or if you would like me to outline how to prepare an external daily P&L series that we can then evaluate here. Once I have that information, I’ll either proceed with the back-test or guide you through the external portfolio construction step.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet