Bombay High Court Slams CBI Over Privacy Breach in ₹800 Crore Scam Probe, Grants Relief to TCE
ByAinvest
Tuesday, Jul 15, 2025 10:09 pm ET1min read
The Bombay High Court stayed a CBI probe against Tata Consulting Engineers (TCE) in a ₹800 crore scam linked to the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority's capital dredging project. The court cited procedural lapses during the investigation and criticized the CBI for breaching privacy by publishing the password of a TCE director's laptop. The court also noted that the password disclosure caused damage to the individual and constituted tampering, which are grounds for discharge.
The Bombay High Court has stayed the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) probe against Tata Consulting Engineers (TCE) in a ₹800 crore scam linked to the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority's (JNPA) capital dredging project. The court cited procedural lapses during the investigation and criticized the CBI for breaching privacy by publishing the password of a TCE director's laptop. The court also noted that the password disclosure caused damage to the individual and constituted tampering, which are grounds for discharge.The CBI registered a case on June 18, 2025, against the former Chief Manager of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority at Navi Mumbai, and four others, including three firms, on charges of cheating, conspiracy, corruption, and causing losses of over ₹800 crore to JNPA. The Bombay High Court, on Tuesday (July 15, 2025), stayed the probe citing procedural lapses and privacy breaches.
The FIR named former JNPA chief manager Sunil Kumar Madabhavi, TCE director Devdutt Bose, Boskalis Smit India LLP, Mumbai, and Jan De Nul Dredging India Pvt. Ltd, Chennai, and other officials and firms involved in the project. The CBI's statement alleged that during the maintenance of dredged channels in Phase-I of the project, JNPA made excess payments aggregating to ₹365.9 crore to the contractors against claims raised for over-dredging of channels. In Phase-II, JNPT made an additional excess payment of ₹438 crore, showing no over-dredging was done in Phase-I or its maintenance period.
The court noted that the memo disclosed the password of a laptop belonging to Devdutt Bose, which it deemed a serious violation of privacy and the Information Technology Act. The court also raised concerns about whether the disclosure was made with malicious intent, potentially benefiting competitors.
The court has directed the CBI to clarify key aspects of the FIR, including the source of the complaint and whether the matter had previously been examined by the Attorney General for India or the JNPT Board of Trustees. The case is scheduled to be heard again after two weeks.
References:
[1] https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/bombay-high-court-criticises-cbi-over-privacy-breach-in-800-crore-scam-probe-grants-relief-to-tce/article69815911.ece

Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue



Comments
No comments yet