Could Bitcoin Become a Pillar of U.S. Economic Strategy by 2025?

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Saturday, Sep 13, 2025 2:12 am ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Alex Thorn, Thorn Capital partner, proposes U.S. could establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve by 2025, citing rising institutional interest and evolving regulations.

- Market reactions are mixed, with investors and policymakers debating feasibility due to Bitcoin's volatility and unclear legal frameworks.

- Critics, including unnamed Commerce Department officials, question Bitcoin's stability for national financial instruments despite Thorn's optimism.

- The debate reflects global trends as governments explore digital assets, with the U.S. facing pressure to lead in redefining monetary policy through cryptocurrencies.

Alex Thorn, a former economic advisor and current partner at Thorn Capital, has suggested that the U.S. market may be underestimating the possibility of the country establishing a strategic

reserve in 2025. Speaking at a recent financial conference in New York, Thorn cited growing institutional interest and evolving regulatory frameworks as key drivers behind this potential development. Thorn’s remarks have sparked a mix of optimism and skepticism among investors and policymakers, with some analysts questioning whether the U.S. has the political will or structural flexibility to pursue such an initiative.

Thorn pointed to recent statements from the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve as signals that the government is increasingly considering the role of Bitcoin in national financial strategy. "The market is largely treating this as speculative chatter, but I believe the groundwork is being laid for something much more concrete," Thorn stated. This sentiment is echoed by a handful of financial analysts who believe that the strategic use of Bitcoin could offer the U.S. a competitive edge in the global digital asset landscape.

Despite Thorn's optimism, industry experts have raised concerns about the feasibility of forming a U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve. Critics argue that the volatility of Bitcoin and the absence of a clear legal framework pose significant challenges. "The notion of a strategic Bitcoin reserve may sound compelling in theory, but it lacks the stability required for a national-level financial instrument," said one unnamed source within the Department of Commerce. These doubts highlight the broader uncertainty surrounding the adoption of digital assets in traditional economic policy.

Thorn’s proposal aligns with a broader trend of governments and central banks exploring the use of digital assets in economic planning. While no official U.S. announcement has been made, Thorn emphasized that the conversation is shifting from conceptual to operational. "We’re not talking about a moonshot anymore. We’re talking about a plausible scenario supported by current trends," he added. This perspective has resonated with some investors, who are beginning to reassess their positions in the Bitcoin market.

The debate over a U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve underscores the growing influence of cryptocurrencies in global financial systems. As more countries consider the strategic use of digital assets, the U.S. is under increasing pressure to either lead or lag behind in this new era of monetary policy. Thorn’s comments serve as a call to action for policymakers to accelerate their evaluation of Bitcoin's potential role in national strategy.