Bitcoin News Today: JPMorgan's Strike Closure Contradicts Trump's Anti-Debanking Order

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Monday, Nov 24, 2025 4:11 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- JPMorgan's closure of Strike CEO Jack Mallers' accounts contradicts Trump's August executive order banning crypto "debanking," sparking regulatory scrutiny.

- Mallers criticized the lack of transparency, noting

cited "concerning activity" without specifics and warned against future account access.

- Industry experts argue such actions risk pushing crypto innovation to unregulated markets, undermining U.S. financial leadership and democratic systems.

- The incident highlights contradictions in JPMorgan's crypto strategy, which recently embraced

as collateral while now enforcing opaque restrictions.

- Critics demand clearer regulatory frameworks to prevent

from using ambiguous AML rules to stifle crypto adoption and innovation.

Chase's abrupt closure of Strike CEO Jack Mallers' accounts in September has reignited debates over "debanking" in the cryptocurrency sector, with critics arguing the move contradicts recent executive orders aimed at curbing such practices. Mallers, whose firm facilitates Bitcoin-based payments, , stating JPMorgan provided no specific reason other than citing "concerning activity" during routine monitoring. The bank's letter also for Mallers, referencing obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act.

The incident has drawn sharp scrutiny amid President Donald Trump's August executive order, which explicitly prohibited financial institutions from cutting off services to crypto-related businesses.

to allegations of "Operation Chokepoint 2.0," a term used by industry leaders to describe purported Biden-era efforts to pressure banks into denying services to crypto entities. Trump's Working Group on Digital Asset Markets had previously claimed the policy was "ended once and for all" in July, but about whether such directives are being enforced consistently.

Mallers emphasized the irony of the situation, noting his father had maintained a private client relationship with JPMorgan for over 30 years. "Every time I asked them why, they said the same thing: 'We aren't allowed to tell you,'" he wrote,

. The bank's refusal to elaborate has led to speculation about regulatory overreach, with Tether's Strategic Advisor Bo Hines publicly questioning whether the alleged Biden-era campaign persists: "Hey Chase... you guys know Operation Choke Point is over, right? Just checking," he tweeted .

Industry experts have framed the incident as a broader challenge for crypto adoption. Jason Allegrante, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer at Fireblocks,

to traditional banking "will just push crypto to thrive elsewhere and leave the US behind," arguing such actions undermine democratic financial systems. Others, like Tether's CEO Paolo Ardoino, took a more philosophical stance, stating, "Bitcoin will resist to the test of time. Those organizations that try to undermine it, will fail and become dust" .

JPMorgan's decision appears at odds with its recent crypto-friendly initiatives, including plans to accept

and as loan collateral and partnerships with platforms like Coinbase. The closure has also reignited historical tensions between traditional finance and crypto, with critics noting that banks often cite anti-money laundering (AML) concerns or regulatory ambiguity to justify such actions . Eric Trump, the president's son, that major banks canceled his family's accounts during his father's first term, a development he said accelerated their embrace of digital assets.

The incident underscores the need for clearer regulatory frameworks to define the boundaries of bank-crypto interactions. Without explicit guidelines, financial institutions may continue to act on perceived risks, perpetuating a climate of uncertainty for crypto businesses. As Mallers' case illustrates, even high-profile figures with long-standing banking relationships remain vulnerable to opaque decisions that could stifle innovation or drive activity to less-regulated markets.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet