Bitcoin News Today: Institutional Investment Reshapes Bitcoin Market as Cycle Theory Loses Relevance

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Thursday, Jul 24, 2025 10:23 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Ki Young Ju admits Bitcoin's traditional 4-year cycle theory is invalid due to institutional investment reshaping market dynamics.

- Institutional investors now prioritize risk management and long-term value, reducing volatility and shifting from retail-driven speculation.

- Market analysts emphasize institutional-grade metrics over cycle-based forecasts, as Bitcoin's role evolves toward portfolio diversification and macro-risk hedging.

- Critics argue retrofitted cycle models lack credibility, while institutions focus on liquidity, regulation, and tech infrastructure for stable price discovery.

Ki Young Ju, founder and CEO of CryptoQuant, has publicly acknowledged the diminishing relevance of the traditional

cycle theory, citing a transformative shift in market dynamics driven by institutional investment [1]. Historically, the four-year cycle model—rooted in whale accumulation and retail-driven speculation—has guided expectations for price surges and corrections. However, Ki emphasized that current trends reveal veteran whales transferring holdings to new, long-term investors, signaling a departure from speculative retail activity [1]. This structural change reflects a surge in institutional participation, which has reshaped trading behaviors and reduced market volatility typically associated with cyclical patterns. Ki admitted his earlier forecasts failed to account for this evolution, underscoring the need for revised analytical frameworks to assess the bull market lifecycle [1].

Institutional investors, once hesitant to engage with Bitcoin, are now adopting strategies prioritizing risk management and long-term value. Their approach diverges from historical reliance on volatility-linked cycles, instead integrating tools like hedging and diversification to mitigate macroeconomic risks [2]. Analysts note that institutions increasingly view Bitcoin as a portfolio diversifier and hedge against inflation or geopolitical instability, rather than a speculative asset tied to halving events [2]. This shift has sparked debates about the relevance of traditional models, with critics arguing that cycle theories are outdated in a maturing market [3].

The recalibration of institutional strategies has also prompted reevaluations of Bitcoin’s role in retirement portfolios. While some forecasts still project profits by October 2025 based on the cycle theory [1], these predictions are increasingly seen as unreliable without incorporating institutional-grade metrics. Hong Sun, a crypto strategist, highlighted that institutional capital now prioritizes liquidity, regulatory clarity, and technological infrastructure—factors absent in retail-driven market swings [5]. This institutional focus on fundamentals is fostering a transition toward stable, data-driven price discovery mechanisms.

Notably, the debate over the 401(k) inclusion of Bitcoin underscores a broader institutional risk-averse stance. Advisors caution against speculative exposure in retirement accounts, reflecting a preference for conservative allocation strategies [6]. Meanwhile, the market’s reliance on advanced tools such as AI-driven analytics and derivative products further distances it from historical volatility patterns. Critics of the cycle theory argue its predictive power has eroded as models are retrofitted to fit outcomes, a practice that undermines credibility [3]. Brasada Capital’s quarterly update reinforced this critique, emphasizing the distinction between volatility and risk in institutional-grade investment frameworks [4].

The Bitcoin market’s structural transformation marks a pivotal moment in its evolution. As institutional strategies gain dominance, the traditional cycle theory—once a cornerstone of crypto analysis—faces reevaluation. Investors are advised to prioritize institutional-grade metrics and long-term fundamentals, moving beyond speculative narratives to navigate a market increasingly shaped by professional capital.

Source:

[1] [Bitcoin Cycle Theory Declared Invalid as Institutional Investment Reshapes Market Dynamics](https://en.coinotag.com/breakingnews/bitcoin-cycle-theory-declared-invalid-as-institutional-investment-reshapes-market-dynamics/)

[2] [Bitcoin as a Portfolio Diversifier](https://www.blocmates.com/)

[3] [Reddit Discussion on Cycle Theory Credibility](https://www.

.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/1m7ud64/daily_discussion_thursday_july_24_2025/)

[4] [Brasada Capital Quarterly Update](https://seekingalpha.com/article/4803806-brasada-capital-second-quarter-of-2025-quarterly-update)

[5] [Institutional Priorities in Bitcoin Investment](https://www.blocmates.com/)

[6] [Bitcoin and Retirement Portfolios](https://www.advisorperspectives.com/firm/bloomberg-news)