Bitcoin News Today: First Direct U.S.-China Cyber Theft Accusation Over $13B Bitcoin Heist

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Tuesday, Nov 11, 2025 5:27 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- China accuses U.S. of orchestrating $13B

theft via 2020 LuBian mining pool cyberattack, alleging state-level coordination.

- U.S. DOJ denies claims, asserting seizure of 127,271 BTC was lawful confiscation of criminal proceeds from Cambodia's Prince Group fraud.

- CVERC disputes DOJ's narrative, claiming 17,800 BTC originated from legitimate mining, while U.S. emphasizes legal authority over digital assets.

- Dispute escalates geopolitical tensions over crypto sovereignty, with Bitcoin trading volatility and potential long-term liquidity impacts noted.

- Case highlights cryptocurrencies' strategic role in U.S.-China rivalry, risking institutional adoption if diplomatic tensions persist.

China has accused the U.S. government of orchestrating a $13 billion

theft in a cyberattack on a Chinese mining pool in 2020, escalating tensions over digital asset control between the two global powers. The Chinese National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) claims the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) seized 127,271 Bitcoin tokens—stolen from the LuBian mining pool in December 2020—as part of a "state-level hacking operation" . The U.S. has denied the allegations, calling the seizure a lawful confiscation of criminal proceeds tied to a fraud scheme led by Cambodia's Prince Group .

The LuBian hack, one of the largest cryptocurrency heists in history, saw 127,426

(worth $3.5 billion at the time) stolen from the mining pool's hot wallet. Blockchain analysts initially speculated the breach stemmed from a technical flaw or insider collusion . By late 2025, the U.S. DOJ revealed it had seized the same Bitcoin, now valued at $13.3 billion, as part of an investigation into Prince Group chairman Chen Zhi, who faces U.S. charges of wire fraud and money laundering . The agency has refused to comment on how it obtained the assets, fueling China's accusations of state-sponsored theft.

CVERC argues the delayed movement of the stolen Bitcoin—dormant for nearly four years before being transferred to U.S.-linked wallets—indicates government-level coordination rather than typical criminal activity . The report also disputes the DOJ's claim that all seized Bitcoin originated from criminal proceeds, asserting that approximately 17,800 BTC came from legitimate mining operations . The U.S. has countered by emphasizing its legal authority to seize assets linked to fraud, a stance that has drawn criticism from Chinese officials who view the move as an overreach of digital sovereignty .

The dispute has injected volatility into the Bitcoin market. Bitcoin (BTC) traded near $105,000 as of late November 2025, down 1.8% in 24 hours, as investors grappled with geopolitical uncertainty. Analysts note that the seizure of 0.65% of Bitcoin's total supply could tighten liquidity, potentially boosting long-term valuations. However, short-term price movements remain sensitive to diplomatic developments. "This is the first time China has directly accused the U.S. of cyber theft involving cryptocurrency," said a regional cybersecurity expert, highlighting the dispute as a "serious escalation in the narrative around digital sovereignty"

.

The conflict adds to broader tensions between the two nations over cryptocurrency regulation and cyber warfare. While the U.S. continues to expand its digital asset enforcement capabilities, China has tightened domestic crypto trading restrictions and advanced its digital yuan initiatives

. The LuBian case underscores the growing role of cryptocurrencies in geopolitical rivalries, with Bitcoin increasingly treated as a strategic asset.

As the U.S. and China trade accusations, the outcome of this dispute could reshape global perceptions of Bitcoin's security and utility. If China escalates its claims through legal or diplomatic channels, it may deter institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies, analysts warn. Conversely, the U.S. seizure reinforces its position as a leader in crypto enforcement, though it risks further straining bilateral relations.

---