AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Bitcoin’s traditional market cycle, once defined by predictable patterns of retail investor behavior and whale-driven price swings, is being upended by a seismic shift toward institutional adoption, according to Ki Young Ju, CEO of on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant. In a recent analysis, Ju argued that the four-year cycle model—rooted in halving events, speculative retail demand, and whale accumulation strategies—is now “profoundly obsolete” due to the influx of institutional capital [1]. This transformation marks a structural break in Bitcoin’s market dynamics, with long-term institutional buyers replacing retail-driven peaks and troughs as the primary force shaping price action.
The traditional cycle theory posited that Bitcoin’s price followed a recurring pattern: a post-bear market accumulation phase led by whales, a retail-driven bull run fueled by fear of missing out (FOMO), a distribution phase where whales offloaded gains, and a subsequent bear market correction. However, Ju highlights that this model no longer applies as “old whales” are increasingly selling to new, institutional-grade long-term holders rather than retail investors. These institutional buyers, including spot
ETF providers like and Fidelity, publicly traded corporations such as , and asset managers, are purchasing Bitcoin for strategic, long-term purposes rather than short-term speculation. This shift reorients supply-demand dynamics, reducing reliance on retail sentiment and introducing steadier capital flows [1].The implications for market behavior are significant. Unlike retail-driven cycles, which often amplified volatility through emotional trading, institutional participation is expected to stabilize Bitcoin’s price. Larger, sustained positions held by institutions reduce speculative selling and create a more predictable supply environment. Additionally, the focus of market drivers is evolving: regulatory developments, macroeconomic trends, and institutional adoption metrics now overshadow retail-driven narratives like halving countdowns [1]. For investors, this means abandoning strategies based on outdated cyclical patterns and instead prioritizing fundamental analysis of institutional flows and long-term value propositions.
CryptoQuant’s CEO emphasized the importance of data-driven tools to navigate this new landscape. On-chain analytics platforms can now track institutional movements, monitor exchange inflows/outflows, and differentiate between speculative selling and long-term distribution. Ju’s own admission that prior market predictions were based on flawed assumptions underscores the need for real-time data to adapt to evolving market structures [1].
The transition to an institution-driven market does not negate Bitcoin’s volatility entirely but reframes its sources. While retail-driven corrections may become less frequent, institutional selling—though less emotionally charged—could introduce new volatility if macroeconomic conditions shift. Investors are advised to adopt dollar-cost averaging and maintain long-term horizons, aligning with the strategic timeframes of institutional holders.
This paradigm shift reflects Bitcoin’s maturation as an asset class. With institutional entities treating Bitcoin as a legitimate store of value and diversification tool, the market’s narrative is shifting from speculative hype to foundational adoption. For Ki Young Ju and CryptoQuant, the key takeaway is clear: understanding the new institutional-led dynamics requires moving beyond historical cycles and embracing a data-centric approach to investment decision-making [1].
Source: [1] [Bitcoin Cycle Theory: Why CryptoQuant CEO Says It’s Profoundly Obsolete Now] [https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/6882be6eb0543364aa5f6390/]

Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet