Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin Lags as Gold and Silver Surge to Records in 2025 Hard-Asset Shift

Generated by AI AgentJax MercerReviewed byShunan Liu
Sunday, Dec 28, 2025 12:20 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

underperformed gold/silver in 2025 despite favorable macro conditions, trading at $87,498 vs. record highs for .

-

($4,524) and ($72/oz) surged due to weak dollar, Fed rate cut expectations, and geopolitical risks, outpacing crypto's "digital gold" narrative.

- Structural differences matter: Silver's industrial demand and supply constraints provide price floor absent in Bitcoin, making crypto more vulnerable to sentiment shifts.

- Market still favors tangible crisis hedges; Bitcoin's "digital gold" thesis remains untested under current macro conditions, requiring institutional adoption or macro shocks to re-rate.

- Risks include silver reversals spilling into crypto and Bitcoin's volatility, though physical demand cushions metals from extreme declines seen in crypto bear markets.

Bitcoin has lagged behind gold and silver in 2025 despite the macroeconomic conditions that should have favored its "digital gold" narrative. As precious metals hit record highs,

remained under pressure, trading at $87,498.12 as of press time. The divergence has raised questions about Bitcoin's role in a hard asset regime dominated by tangible hedges .

Silver, in particular, has captured the market's attention with a parabolic rally into year-end, hitting $72 an ounce on December 24. Gold followed a similar trajectory, reaching $4,524.30 the same day. These gains came alongside a weaker dollar, expectations of Fed rate cuts in 2026, and rising geopolitical risk-factors many had expected to push Bitcoin higher

.

Investors are now scrutinizing why the safe-haven bid has favored metals over crypto. The market is treating gold and silver as trusted crisis hedges, while Bitcoin is seen as a high-beta asset that benefits from liquidity and narrative momentum but does not reliably rally during periods of fear-driven sentiment

.

Why the Standoff Happened

The macro currents that typically benefit hard assets have not translated into outsized Bitcoin gains. Despite lower real yields, a weaker dollar, and geopolitical stress, Bitcoin spent most of 2025 consolidating or selling off, failing to sustain momentum even with record spot ETF inflows

.

One explanation lies in the structural differences between the assets. Silver's rally has been driven not just by safe-haven demand, but also by industrial and green technology usage. A tight supply chain and limited substitution have supported its price, making it more than just a store of value

.

Bitcoin lacks this industrial demand. While it benefits from lower rates and a weaker dollar, it does not have a direct secular bid like silver does. This asymmetry means Bitcoin's price is more vulnerable to macro sentiment shifts and speculative overhangs

.

What This Means for Investors

The silver and gold rally is a macro barometer, not a direct trading signal for Bitcoin. It shows the market is willing to pay up for scarce, non-yielding assets when the narrative is trusted, but it also highlights a preference for tangible hedges during periods of geopolitical stress and rate-cut expectations

.

For Bitcoin investors, this means the asset's time to outperform is not yet here. The market is still favoring assets with a longer track record of crisis resilience. Bitcoin's "digital gold" thesis has not broken, but it has not yet been tested under the right conditions

.

Looking ahead, Bitcoin could eventually re-rate into the broader hard-asset trade if conditions shift. This could happen through institutional allocation shifts, retail sentiment recovery, or a macro shock that makes Bitcoin's properties-like censorship resistance and programmability-more valuable

.

Risks to the Outlook

One risk is that the current rally in silver could reverse. A sharp pullback due to a hawkish Fed turn, dollar strength, or speculative unwinding could spill over into crypto markets, affecting Bitcoin as part of broader de-risking

.

Bitcoin's volatility and lack of an industrial floor also make it more fragile than silver. While silver can fall, it is unlikely to crater the way Bitcoin has in past bear markets due to the baseline physical demand that persists regardless of macro sentiment

.

For now, investors should closely monitor the conditions that drive hard assets. The key for Bitcoin will be whether it can capture the same macro bid that has propelled gold and silver to record highs. Until then, the performance of precious metals serves as a reminder that macro tailwinds do not automatically translate into crypto participation

.