Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin Developers Warn of Quantum Threat to 25% of Coins

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Wednesday, Jul 16, 2025 4:35 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Bitcoin developers warn quantum computing risks could compromise 25% of Bitcoin stored in legacy wallets using ECDSA/SHA-256 algorithms.

- A proposed defense plan urges users to migrate funds to post-quantum-secure addresses to avoid permanent access loss.

- Critics argue the transition risks network fragmentation and fund loss, while proponents stress urgency to preempt catastrophic attacks.

- The plan incorporates BIP 360 cryptographic upgrades, requiring coordinated community action to safeguard Bitcoin's long-term viability.

Bitcoin developers have issued a warning about the potential risks posed by quantum computing to the cryptocurrency's security infrastructure. The primary concern is that advancements in quantum technology could eventually compromise widely used cryptographic protections such as ECDSA and SHA-256, which are currently employed by Bitcoin. This could potentially expose up to 25% of all Bitcoin, including coins stored in dormant legacy wallets, to theft.

The developers have proposed a new defense plan aimed at mitigating these risks. The plan urges Bitcoin holders and miners to transition to post-quantum-secure addresses. The strategy emphasizes that failure to upgrade could result in the permanent loss of access to funds. This approach frames security as a personal incentive, encouraging users to upgrade their wallets to protect their assets.

The proposal references BIP 360, a quantum-safe upgrade designed by Anduro’s Hunter Beast, and includes contributions from developers like Marathon’s Michael B. Casey. Casey supports limiting vulnerable wallet activity to delay potential attacks, highlighting the need for proactive measures to safeguard the network.

While some analysts downplay the urgency of the threat, Bitcoin developer James Lopp maintains that the community must act early. Lopp warns that the fallout from a successful quantum attack would be catastrophic, potentially flooding the market with stolen coins and eroding trust in the cryptocurrency. The goal is to encourage the transition to quantum-resistant wallets before a breakthrough in quantum technology puts user funds at risk.

The proposed defense plan involves the implementation of post-quantum cryptographic algorithms, which are designed to be resistant to attacks from quantum computers. These algorithms use mathematical problems that are believed to be difficult for quantum computers to solve, providing a higher level of security for Bitcoin transactions. The plan also emphasizes the importance of migrating to new addresses that support post-quantum cryptography, which would involve creating new wallets and transferring funds to these addresses.

The proposal has sparked debate within the Bitcoin community, with some developers and users expressing concerns about the feasibility and potential impact of the transition. Critics argue that the migration to post-quantum-secure addresses could lead to fragmentation within the network, as not all users may be willing or able to make the switch. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential for errors during the migration process, which could result in the loss of funds.

Despite these challenges, the developers behind the proposal remain optimistic about the potential for post-quantum cryptography to enhance the security of the Bitcoin network. They argue that the transition to post-quantum-secure addresses is a necessary step to protect the cryptocurrency from the evolving threat landscape posed by quantum computing. The developers are calling on the Bitcoin community to come together and support the implementation of this defense plan, in order to ensure the long-term viability and security of the network.

Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet