Bitcoin News Today: S&P 500 Stands by Operational Standards, Excludes Bitcoin-Driven MSTR

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Sunday, Nov 30, 2025 4:42 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

excludes for third time, citing reliance on assets over operational revenue.

-

reviews crypto-heavy firms, proposing 50% asset threshold for benchmark removal to maintain sector balance.

- Saylor defends MSTR's corporate identity but acknowledges

resemble investment vehicles with minimal software revenue.

- Index providers prioritize operational stability and profitability, contrasting MSTR's volatile Bitcoin-linked earnings and losses.

- Market context shows S&P 500 at "expensive" valuation, reinforcing focus on traditional economic drivers over speculative assets.

The S&P 500's latest quarterly index update, announced Nov. 24, has once again excluded Michael Saylor's Strategy (MSTR),

on companies that derive revenue primarily from asset exposure rather than operational fundamentals. Despite MSTR's market capitalization placing it among the 250 largest U.S. companies, the firm-formerly known for software but now heavily invested in Bitcoin-has never been added to the S&P 500. its preference for businesses with tangible operating models, a criterion fails to meet due to its reliance on digital asset treasuries.

The S&P 500's exclusion of MSTR aligns with broader industry norms. The index typically avoids firms that function as investment vehicles, including holding companies or those whose primary income stems from asset appreciation rather than product sales or services. S&P's Index Committee evaluates companies through a mix of quantitative metrics and qualitative judgments, with operational sustainability and sector representation as key priorities.

to accumulation, does not align with these standards.

Compounding the issue, MSTR faces potential removal from MSCI's USA benchmark.

that MSCI is reviewing how to classify companies with significant crypto holdings, proposing that firms with digital assets exceeding 50% of total assets be excluded to avoid distorting sector weightings. This mirrors S&P's rationale, as both indices aim to reflect economic activity rooted in operational performance rather than speculative asset exposure.

MSTR's status, insisting the company is "not a fund, not a trust, and not a holding company." However, his arguments inadvertently highlight the core challenge: MSTR's financials resemble those of an investment vehicle. The firm's revenue from software operations is minimal compared to its Bitcoin holdings, and its earnings reports often reflect net losses, diverging sharply from the profitability profiles of typical S&P 500 constituents. typically generate tens of billions in annual revenue and maintain consistent profitability, criteria MSTR currently fails to meet.

The broader market context further complicates MSTR's prospects.

(PE) ratio stands at 28.36, a level classified as "expensive" relative to its historical averages. While elevated valuations reflect investor optimism about corporate earnings, they also highlight the index's focus on traditional economic drivers. MSTR's inclusion would disrupt sectoral balance and introduce volatility tied to Bitcoin's price swings, which index providers aim to avoid .

For now, MSTR's exclusion appears inevitable. The S&P 500 and MSCI's criteria prioritize operational fundamentals and sectoral stability, leaving little room for firms whose value is primarily tied to speculative assets. Saylor's vision of redefining corporate treasuries through Bitcoin remains at odds with the conservative standards of major indices, which continue to prioritize economic productivity over digital asset exposure.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet