Bitcoin's Divergent Technical Signals: Is This Time Truly Different?
Bitcoin's technical landscape in November 2025 is a tapestry of conflicting signals, with bullish and bearish indicators locked in a tug-of-war. On one hand, on-chain metrics like the Puell Multiple and MVRV ratio hint at undervaluation and potential bottoms. On the other, moving averages and macroeconomic headwinds paint a bearish picture. The question looms: Is this time different, or are we witnessing another false dawn in Bitcoin's cyclical journey?
Bullish Signals: Accumulation and Undervaluation
The Puell Multiple, a critical on-chain metric, currently sits at 0.67, just above the 0.50 threshold historically associated with Bitcoin's cycle lows since 2015. This suggests miner capitulation-a scenario where miners are forced to sell at a loss, often preceding a market bottom. Meanwhile, the Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) ratio has plummeted to levels last seen in April 2025, signaling a potential accumulation phase. Analysts argue this indicates retail and institutional buyers are stepping in, stabilizing the price near $100,000.
Candlestick patterns also offer cautious optimism. A hammer candle formed in mid-November, suggesting a short-term reversal. Additionally, Bitcoin's price has tested key support levels like $84,000 and $75,000 without breaking them, with a 91% probability of avoiding a weekly close below current lows. Historically, November has been Bitcoin's strongest month, averaging a 42.5% return (though skewed by 2013's outlier).
Bearish Signals: Structural Weakness and Macro Headwinds
The 50-day EMA ($104,595) trading below the 200-day EMA ($104,698) signals a bearish "Death Cross," a trend often associated with prolonged downturns. The MACD (-447.99) and RSI (39.08) remain neutral to bearish, with no clear momentum to break higher. On-chain metrics like the Pi Cycle, which historically predicted tops (e.g., 2013, 2017, 2021), failed to catch the November 2021 peak, casting doubt on its reliability.
Macro factors exacerbate the bearish case. Bitcoin ETF outflows hit a record $3.79 billion in November as institutions shifted to altcoins. Rising U.S. Treasury yields and a strengthening dollar (DXY) have also pressured risk assets, with Bitcoin's correlation to the dollar index worsening according to market analysis. Meanwhile, the NVT ratio-a measure of network value relative to transaction volume-has fallen to -1.6, historically signaling undervaluation but also hinting at a fragile recovery.
The Paradox of Divergence
The tension between these signals is not new. In 2021, the Pi Cycle missed a peak, and the 50/200 EMA crossover strategy underperformed in real-world trading due to slippage and volatility. Yet, Bitcoin's MVRV Z-Score currently mirrors levels from May 2017, a period that preceded a multi-hundred percent rally. This raises the question: Are we seeing a repeat of history, or is the market evolving?
One key difference in 2025 is the role of institutional investors. Long-term holders (LTHs) have been accumulating despite the bearish backdrop, preventing a breakdown below $85,000. This contrasts with past cycles, where retail panic often accelerated declines. However, ETF outflows suggest institutional caution, complicating the bullish narrative.
Is This Time Different?
Bitcoin's technical indicators are in a state of flux, with no clear consensus. The Puell Multiple and MVRV ratio suggest a bottom is near, but the 50/200 EMA death cross and macroeconomic headwinds argue for caution. Historically, November has been a strong month, but 2025's context-rising rates, geopolitical tensions, and a maturing institutional market-adds complexity.
For investors, the answer may lie in diversification. Short-term traders might focus on Fibonacci retracements and candlestick patterns, while long-term holders could view the current environment as a buying opportunity. As one analyst noted, "Bitcoin's market is a mosaic of signals. This time, the pieces are just a bit more fragmented."
El AI Writing Agent conecta las perspectivas financieras con el desarrollo de los proyectos. Muestra los avances en forma de gráficos, curvas de rendimiento y cronologías de hitos importantes. De vez en cuando, utiliza indicadores básicos de análisis técnico para ilustrar los datos. Su estilo narrativo es adecuado para aquellos innovadores e inversores en etapas iniciales, quienes buscan oportunidades y crecimiento.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.



Comments
No comments yet