Bitcoin's Demand Drought: A Precursor to Prolonged Bear Market?

Generated by AI AgentCarina RivasReviewed byDavid Feng
Saturday, Dec 20, 2025 5:19 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Bitcoin's November 2025 market shows conflicting signals: on-chain metrics like NUPL (0.522) indicate oversold conditions, while institutional ETF inflows ($57B) suggest resilience.

- Large holders (10K–100K BTC) reduced exposure by 1.5%, contrasting with mid-tier whales increasing holdings by 0.47%, revealing a shift in ownership dynamics.

- ETF volatility (e.g., $524M inflow followed by 30% market depth drop) highlights liquidity risks, yet long-term holders maintain 30.5% supply, signaling mixed positioning.

- Record put option skews and Fed rate cuts suggest temporary correction within a broader bull cycle, but sustained outflows or support level breaches could trigger deeper bear markets.

The

market in November 2025 is caught in a paradox. On-chain demand metrics paint a picture of fragility, with the Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) ratio akin to the "Tariff Tantrum" of Spring 2025 and the "Yen implosion" of August 2024. Meanwhile, institutional activity-driven by ETF flows and macroeconomic tailwinds-suggests a more nuanced narrative. This article dissects the interplay between on-chain demand and institutional behavior to assess whether Bitcoin's current correction signals a prolonged bear market or a cyclical bearish phase within a broader bull cycle.

On-Chain Demand: A Tale of Two Holders

Bitcoin's on-chain metrics reveal a market split between capitulation and accumulation. The NUPL ratio, a critical gauge of holder sentiment, has

, indicating that over half of Bitcoin's supply is now in a loss position. This mirrors historical bearish inflection points, such as the 2022 market crash, where NUPL dipped below 0.4 before rebounding. However, the current context differs: while large holders (10K–100K BTC) have reduced exposure, . This divergence suggests that retail and mid-tier investors are stepping in as institutional players rotate out.

The movement of 63,000 BTC from long-term to short-term wallets in a single event

.
K33's analysis notes that since 2024, signaling deliberate distribution rather than routine technical activity. Yet, the Coin Days Destroyed metric , hinting that large, longtime holders may have already sold off their positions. This raises a critical question: Is the current on-chain weakness a precursor to a deeper bear market, or a consolidation phase as institutional buyers take the reins?

Institutional Behavior: ETF Flows and Macro Tailwinds

Institutional demand for Bitcoin has

, with spot ETFs attracting $57 billion in cumulative assets by November. However, this inflow has been volatile. For instance, a $524 million inflow on November 10, 2025, was followed by a 30% drop in market depth, below $90,000. This volatility highlights a key tension: while ETFs have democratized institutional access to Bitcoin, they also amplify liquidity risks during periods of macroeconomic uncertainty.

The Federal Reserve's rate-cut cycle and bipartisan crypto legislation in the U.S. have

. Yet, ETF outflows in November-reaching $3.5 billion-have pressured prices, with mid-tier "whale" wallets (100 BTC+) as larger holders reduced exposure by 1.5%. This suggests a strategic shift in ownership from long-term institutions to mid-tier investors, a pattern observed during prior bull-market corrections.

The Interplay: On-Chain Metrics and Institutional Flows

The correlation between institutional ETF flows and on-chain demand is complex. For example, Fidelity's Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC)

in late November, coinciding with a 45,000 BTC accumulation by large investors . This indicates that while ETF outflows triggered short-term selling, institutional buyers continued to accumulate at lower price levels.

Put option skew for Bitcoin, at record highs for 3- and 6-month tenors, further illustrates this duality.

, suggesting a belief that the current correction is temporary. Meanwhile, the percentage of Bitcoin supply held for over five years remains stable at 30.5%, while short-term active supply has -the highest since July 2021. This shift implies a mix of speculative activity and long-term positioning, complicating the bearish narrative.

Conclusion: Bear Market Precursor or Cyclical Correction?

Bitcoin's demand drought in November 2025 reflects a market at a crossroads. On-chain metrics like NUPL and MVRV ratios signal overextended conditions, while institutional ETF flows and macroeconomic factors hint at resilience. The key differentiator lies in the behavior of large holders: if long-term whales continue to accumulate amid ETF outflows, the current correction could mirror the 2022 bear market-a temporary setback within a broader bull cycle. Conversely, sustained outflows from mid-tier holders and a failure to retest critical support levels (e.g., $74,000) could signal a deeper bear market.

For now, the data suggests a hybrid scenario. Institutional buyers are hedging against volatility, while smaller investors are stepping in to accumulate. As the Federal Reserve's rate-cut cycle progresses and crypto legislation gains momentum, Bitcoin's demand dynamics may yet pivot from drought to revival.