Bitcoin Cash (BCH) as a High-Potential Alternative to Bitcoin in the Electronic Cash Narrative

Generated by AI AgentEvan HultmanReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Saturday, Dec 6, 2025 11:17 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

Cash's Velma fork (May 2025) enhanced scalability with 32 MB blocks, 10,000-byte stack limits, and BigInt support, enabling DeFi and low-cost transactions under $0.01.

-

outperforms Bitcoin in transaction throughput (50x larger blocks) and fees, with $50B+ 2025 volume and 553k+ merchants adopting its fast, low-cost payment model.

- While Bitcoin retains 60%+ market dominance, BCH's $551 price and 30% YoY growth position it as a complementary electronic cash solution with rising merchant and developer adoption.

- Challenges remain in DeFi TVL compared to Ethereum/Solana, but Velma's smart contract upgrades create potential for ecosystem expansion and long-term value for efficiency-focused investors.

In the evolving landscape of digital currencies,

(BCH) has emerged as a compelling contender to (BTC) in the electronic cash narrative. The May 2025 Velma fork marked a pivotal moment for , introducing technical upgrades that position it as a scalable, low-cost, and programmable alternative to Bitcoin. This article examines BCH's post-Velma fork advancements, comparing its technical, market, and adoption advantages to Bitcoin, and evaluates its potential to redefine the electronic cash paradigm.

Technical Advantages: Scalability and Programmability

The Velma fork fundamentally reshaped BCH's technical capabilities. By removing constraints on smart contract development through VM Limits, BCH now supports stack element sizes of up to 10,000 bytes-far exceeding Bitcoin's 520-byte limit. This expansion, coupled with a budgeting system that allocates computational resources based on transaction input sizes,

. These changes enable BCH to handle complex financial applications, such as decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and cross-chain bridges, while maintaining low fees.

Additionally, the BigInt enhancement introduced in the Velma fork allows high-precision arithmetic calculations,

. This feature addresses a key limitation of Bitcoin, which lacks native support for such computations. Meanwhile, BCH's 32 MB block size-compared to Bitcoin's 1 MB-ensures faster transaction throughput and near-zero fees, even during peak demand. , while Bitcoin's fees fluctuate between $1 and $100, depending on network congestion.

Market Performance: Growing Utility and Investor Interest

BCH's post-Velma fork upgrades have catalyzed renewed investor interest.

, with analysts projecting a potential rise to $600 under favorable market conditions. This growth is underpinned by BCH's expanding utility as a payment solution. in transaction volume, reaching $50 billion in 2025. This surge reflects BCH's ability to serve as a practical medium of exchange, particularly in markets where low-cost, fast transactions are prioritized.

In contrast, Bitcoin's dominance in the crypto market remains strong,

. However, Bitcoin's technical limitations-such as its 1 MB block size and reliance on layer 2 solutions for scalability-make it less suited for everyday transactions. , BCH's larger block size and optimized fee structure position it as a more viable option for merchants and consumers seeking efficiency.

Adoption Metrics: Merchant and Ecosystem Growth

BCH's adoption metrics highlight its growing traction in the real world. As of 2025,

, supported by 80 payment gateways that facilitate seamless integration. This adoption is further evidenced by a 15% increase in active addresses, . While Bitcoin remains the dominant cryptocurrency in merchant transactions (accounting for 42% of all crypto payments), is attracting a niche but expanding user base.

However, BCH faces challenges in ecosystem adoption.

compared to and . This gap underscores the need for further developer engagement and ecosystem growth. Nevertheless, the Velma fork's smart contract enhancements have laid the groundwork for BCH to attract innovative projects, potentially bridging this divide.

Conclusion: A Rival in the Electronic Cash Narrative

Bitcoin Cash's post-Velma fork upgrades have solidified its position as a high-potential alternative to Bitcoin in the electronic cash narrative. Technically, BCH's larger block size, VM Limits, and BigInt capabilities offer superior scalability and programmability for real-world use cases. Market data and adoption metrics further demonstrate BCH's growing utility as a payment solution, with transaction volumes and merchant partnerships expanding rapidly. While Bitcoin's dominance in the crypto market remains unchallenged, BCH's focus on efficiency and accessibility positions it as a complementary asset in the broader digital economy.

For investors, the key takeaway is clear: BCH's post-Velma fork trajectory suggests a compelling case for long-term value, particularly for those prioritizing low-cost, high-throughput transactions. As the electronic cash narrative evolves, Bitcoin Cash may well emerge as the underdog with the tools to rival the king.