Bitcoin ATM Fraud Hits Record High, $333 Million Pilfered In 2025: Report

Generated by AI AgentMira SolanoReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Sunday, Jan 4, 2026 11:59 am ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- FBI reported $333M in

ATM fraud in 2025, up from $250M in 2024, with 12,000+ complaints filed.

- Scammers impersonated banks/government agencies to trick victims into depositing cash, targeting elderly users (median age 71).

- Washington, D.C. sued Athena Bitcoin, alleging 93% of its transactions were fraudulent and fees were hidden from victims.

- AARP and 17 states pushed for stricter regulations, including transaction limits and refund mechanisms to combat fraud.

- Regulators face balancing security with cryptocurrency innovation as 45,000+ ATMs remain operational nationwide.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported a record increase in

ATM fraud in 2025, with scammers defrauding Americans of over $333 million. This represents a sharp rise compared to 2024, when losses were approximately $250 million. The FBI in such fraudulent activity.

Cryptocurrency kiosks have become a favored tool for fraudsters. Scammers often manipulate victims into depositing cash into these ATMs under false pretenses, converting the cash into Bitcoin and transferring it to their wallets. The FBI

from January to November 2025, reflecting a significant increase from the same period in the prior year.

Law enforcement agencies and consumer protection groups have taken notice. The Washington, D.C., attorney general's office sued Athena Bitcoin, one of the largest providers of Bitcoin ATMs, alleging the company pocketed undisclosed fees from scam victims. The lawsuit claimed that 93% of transactions on Athena's machines were fraudulent and that the median age of victims was 71

.

Why Did This Happen?

The rapid growth in Bitcoin ATM usage has made these machines attractive to scammers. There are now more than 45,000 Bitcoin ATMs across the U.S., with over 30,000 of them located in the country alone. These kiosks enable users to deposit cash and send it to a digital wallet in minutes, a process that is nearly impossible to reverse once completed

.

The FBI

impersonate banks or government agencies, advising victims to deposit cash into a Bitcoin ATM to protect their funds. This tactic plays on fear and urgency, pushing victims to act quickly without verifying the legitimacy of the request.

How Did Markets Respond?

Regulators and consumer advocacy groups are responding to the crisis. The American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) has called for stricter regulations, including daily transaction limits, clearer scam warnings, and refund mechanisms when fraud is confirmed. At least 17 U.S. states have passed laws regulating Bitcoin ATMs, while some municipalities have banned them outright

.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) also

about the increasing use of Bitcoin ATMs for illicit activities. The agency emphasized the need for stronger oversight to prevent these machines from becoming a primary conduit for financial fraud.

What Are Analysts Watching Next?

Industry experts are closely monitoring how regulatory actions will impact the Bitcoin ATM market. Some analysts suggest that transaction limits and mandatory consumer education could reduce the number of fraudulent activities. Others warn that without stronger enforcement, scammers will continue to exploit the lack of chargeback protections in cryptocurrency transactions

.

The FBI and other law enforcement agencies are also tracking the effectiveness of existing laws. The Washington, D.C. lawsuit against Athena Bitcoin and similar actions in other states highlight the growing regulatory scrutiny. As of now, no major Bitcoin ATM operator has implemented a comprehensive solution to prevent fraudulent transactions

.

Bitcoin ATM fraud is expected to remain a key issue in 2026. With over 45,000 machines across the U.S., regulators and law enforcement must balance accessibility with security. The challenge lies in implementing safeguards without stifling the innovation that made cryptocurrency attractive in the first place

.