Bitcoin's 2025 Post-Halving Dilemma: Is the 4-Year Cycle Theory Losing Its Luster?

Generated by AI AgentRiley SerkinReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Monday, Dec 29, 2025 1:39 am ET3min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Bitcoin's 2024 halving defied historical patterns, closing 2025 with a 13.5% price drop - the first post-halving year in red.

- Institutional adoption (e.g., $50B ETF inflows) and macroeconomic factors (Fed rate cuts) replaced retail-driven volatility as key price drivers.

- Technical indicators (NVT, RSI) and whale selling highlight structural shifts, with institutional demand now dominating market dynamics.

- 2026 optimism hinges on ETF growth, reduced exchange reserves, and macroeconomic tailwinds, though regulatory risks persist.

The

halving of May 2024 marked a pivotal moment in the cryptocurrency's history, yet its aftermath has defied expectations. For decades, the four-year cycle theory-rooted in the idea that Bitcoin's price surges post-halving due to reduced supply-has guided investor behavior. But as 2025 draws to a close, the data paints a more complex picture. Bitcoin closed the year in the red for the first time post-halving, challenging the narrative that scarcity alone drives price action. This article examines the technical and structural forces reshaping Bitcoin's market dynamics, evaluates the validity of the 4-year cycle, and explores whether institutional demand and macroeconomic shifts can catalyze a 2026 rebound.

The 2024 Halving: A Deviation from Historical Patterns

Bitcoin's price trajectory post-2024 halving diverged sharply from prior cycles. By November 2024, the asset had risen 41.2% to $90,446, underperforming the 53.3% and 122.5% gains seen after the 2016 and 2020 halvings, respectively

. While the price surged to $126,000 by October 2025, it ultimately closed the year at $88,300-a 13.5% decline from its November peak . This outcome marks the first time a post-halving year ended with negative returns, signaling a breakdown in the traditional cycle's predictive power.

The absence of a "blow-off top"-a hallmark of previous cycles-further complicates the narrative. Instead of speculative frenzies, Bitcoin's 2025 rally was driven by institutional adoption and macroeconomic tailwinds. The launch of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs in early 2025

, while improved liquidity for risk assets. These factors decoupled Bitcoin from retail-driven volatility, creating a new paradigm where institutional demand and macro trends dominate price action.

Technical and Structural Market Analysis: A Bearish Undercurrent

On-chain metrics and technical indicators reveal a bearish undercurrent despite Bitcoin's structural strength. By December 2025, daily active addresses had fallen to a one-year low

, while the Network Value to Transaction (NVT) ratio-a valuation metric-remained elevated, suggesting overvaluation. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) and Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) also signaled overbought conditions in late 2025, followed by a sharp correction .

Structurally, Bitcoin's hash rate hit an all-time high in April 2025

, reflecting sustained miner confidence. However, this growth did not translate into price appreciation, squeezing profit margins for smaller miners and accelerating industry consolidation. Meanwhile, wallet distribution data highlights a stark divide: whales holding 1,000+ BTC engaged in sustained selling, while smaller holders (under 1,000 BTC) remained in accumulation mode . This divergence suggests a shift from retail-driven cycles to institution-driven dynamics, where large players dictate price action.

The 4-Year Cycle Theory: A Broken Framework?

The 4-year cycle theory, which assumes Bitcoin's price peaks 12–18 months post-halving, has lost explanatory power in 2025. Historically, halvings have triggered short-term price spikes due to reduced supply, but the 2024 event coincided with a broader shift in market structure. U.S. spot ETFs and corporate treasuries now absorb large Bitcoin supply blocks without triggering panic selling

, while macroeconomic factors like interest rates and inflation have become dominant drivers.

This evolution challenges the notion that Bitcoin's price is solely a function of its supply schedule. Instead, demand-side dynamics-particularly institutional adoption-are now paramount. As noted by 21Shares, "The cycle is not broken; it's just being redefined by new market participants and regulatory frameworks

."

Can 2026 Deliver a Rebound?

Despite 2025's underperformance, the outlook for 2026 remains cautiously optimistic. Bitwise forecasts a surge in ETF inflows as regulatory clarity improves, while J.P. Morgan and Bernstein predict Bitcoin could reach $150,000–$170,000

. These projections hinge on two key factors:

  1. Macroeconomic Tailwinds: Easing inflation and Fed rate cuts are expected to improve liquidity for risk assets, including Bitcoin . If the U.S. economy avoids a recession, Bitcoin's correlation with equities (e.g., S&P 500) could strengthen its case as a portfolio diversifier .
  2. Structural Scarcity: Exchange reserves are at multi-year lows , and a growing portion of Bitcoin is locked in long-term wallets and ETFs. This tightening of supply, combined with sustained institutional demand, creates a foundation for appreciation.

However, risks persist. Regulatory uncertainty-particularly around stablecoins and derivatives-could disrupt flows

, while a global macroeconomic downturn might suppress risk appetite.

Conclusion: A New Era for Bitcoin Cycles

Bitcoin's 2025 performance underscores a fundamental shift in its market dynamics. The 4-year cycle theory, once a cornerstone of crypto analysis, is being redefined by institutional adoption, macroeconomic forces, and evolving on-chain behavior. While the asset closed 2025 in the red, the structural underpinnings-ETF growth, reduced supply, and institutional demand-suggest a potential rebound in 2026. Investors must now navigate a landscape where cycles are less about scarcity and more about demand-side innovation.