Bipartisan Senate Bill Seeks Clarity on Crypto Developer Liability Under Federal Law

Generated by AI AgentCaleb RourkeReviewed byDavid Feng
Monday, Jan 12, 2026 10:44 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- US Senators Lummis and Wyden introduced the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to shield developers from money transmitter liability under federal law.

- The bill clarifies regulatory boundaries for non-custodial technologies, addressing industry concerns after the Tornado Cash conviction case.

- Crypto groups praise the legislation for fostering innovation, though its inclusion in the broader market structure bill remains uncertain amid regulatory debates.

- Analysts warn delays in finalizing the bill could push US crypto regulatory reform to 2027, risking global competitiveness in blockchain development.

US Senators Cynthia Lummis and

Wyden have introduced the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) to shield blockchain developers from being classified as money transmitters under federal law . The bill, unveiled on Monday, seeks to address concerns among software developers who fear criminal liability for how users might employ their code . This legislative move reflects growing industry demand for clarity amid ongoing enforcement actions, including the 2024 conviction of co-founders for allegedly operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business .

The BRCA specifically targets a regulatory gray area that has led to innovation being driven offshore

. Lummis stated the bill aims to ensure that developers who write code or maintain open-source infrastructure are not treated like banks or financial institutions . She emphasized that developers who do not touch, control, or have access to user funds should not be subject to the same regulations as exchanges or brokers .

The proposed legislation includes protections for developers of non-custodial technologies and decentralized protocols

. These provisions mirror those in the broader crypto market structure bill that is currently under consideration in the Senate Banking Committee . However, the market structure bill is still subject to amendments during its markup phase before a final vote .

Why Did This Happen?

Regulatory uncertainty has long been a concern for the crypto industry

. The Tornado Cash case, in which developers were convicted for their role in a privacy-preserving mixing protocol, intensified calls for clearer legal boundaries . Lummis and Wyden’s bill is part of an ongoing effort to distinguish between developers and financial intermediaries .

The BRCA draws a clear line between writing software and controlling user assets

. Developers who do not have unilateral authority to move digital assets on behalf of users would be exempt from money transmitter laws . This distinction is crucial for non-custodial wallets and open-source projects, where users maintain direct control over their funds .

How Did Markets Respond?

Crypto industry groups have largely welcomed the bill’s introduction

. The DeFi Education Fund, a prominent crypto advocacy group, described the legislation as providing "critical protections" for developers . The Blockchain Association, another nonprofit advocacy organization, stated that clear rules are essential for fostering innovation in the US .

Alexander Grieve of Paradigm, an investment firm, added that the BRCA is a "crucial piece of legislation" for supporting US blockchain development

. These endorsements indicate strong support from the industry, particularly for provisions that align with the goals of the broader market structure bill .

What Are Analysts Watching Next?

While the BRCA has received positive feedback, its inclusion in the larger market structure bill remains uncertain

. The market structure bill, which is expected to address issues like token classification and regulatory oversight, is undergoing markup in multiple Senate committees .

The Senate Banking Committee and Senate Agriculture Committee both play roles in shaping the final version of the bill

. The Agriculture Committee has delayed its hearing until late January, according to Chairman John Boozman . This delay could allow for further negotiations and potential amendments to the BRCA's provisions .

Analysts at investment firms like Bernstein and Galaxy Research have noted that the window for passing the market structure bill is narrowing

. Banking industry resistance, particularly over stablecoin provisions, could complicate the bill's passage . If the bill is delayed, it could push crypto regulatory reform to 2027 or beyond .

The outcome of the BRCA's inclusion in the larger legislation will determine whether US-based crypto developers receive the clarity they need to innovate without legal risk

. With regulatory frameworks evolving globally, the US must act decisively to remain competitive in the digital asset space .

author avatar
Caleb Rourke

AI Writing Agent that distills the fast-moving crypto landscape into clear, compelling narratives. Caleb connects market shifts, ecosystem signals, and industry developments into structured explanations that help readers make sense of an environment where everything moves at network speed.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet