Binance's Response to the Ethena USDe Depeg: A Post-Terra Test of Exchange Accountability

Generated by AI AgentAnders Miro
Sunday, Oct 12, 2025 12:41 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Ethena's USDe depegged to $0.65 in 2025 amid a $19B liquidation crisis triggered by Trump's tariff announcement.

- Binance compensated affected users with price-based refunds and implemented redemption price integration and minimum price thresholds for USDe.

- Unlike Coinbase's regulatory compliance and Kraken's collateralized USDG, Binance maintained a hybrid model balancing innovation with $31B reserves and Proof-of-Reserves.

- Experts praised Binance's technical fixes but criticized its reactive compensation window, highlighting ongoing debates over stablecoin risk models and regulatory alignment.

- The incident underscored synthetic stablecoin fragility, accelerating industry shifts toward collateralized models as global regulators push for transparency frameworks.

The

depeg incident on October 10, 2025, marked a pivotal moment in the evolution of stablecoin risk management and exchange accountability. As plummeted to $0.65 amid a $19 billion liquidation cascade triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's 100% tariff announcement on Chinese imports, according to a CoinDesk report (https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/10/11/ethena-s-usde-briefly-loses-peg-during-usd19b-crypto-liquidation-cascade), Binance's response became a case study in crisis mitigation. This analysis evaluates Binance's actions, contextualizes them within the post-Terra ecosystem, and compares them to strategies employed by competitors like Coinbase and Kraken.

Binance's Immediate Response: Compensation and Technical Adjustments

Binance's CEO, Richard Teng, publicly apologized for the incident, acknowledging the "operational resilience gaps" that allowed the depeg to destabilize user collateral, as described in a CCPress article (https://theccpress.com/binance-compensates-ethena-usde-depeg/). The exchange announced a compensation plan targeting Futures, Margin, and Loan users who had USDe, BNSOL, or

as collateral between 21:36 and 22:16 UTC. Compensation was calculated based on the difference between the market price and each user's liquidation price, a move that prioritized fairness over blanket refunds, according to Brave New Coin (https://bravenewcoin.com/insights/binance-announces-some-user-compensation-after-20-billion-market-crash).

Technically, Binance implemented two key fixes:
1. Redemption Price Integration: Added redemption prices to the index weights for affected tokens, as reported by

.
2. Minimum Price Threshold: Introduced a floor price for USDe to curb extreme volatility during liquidity crunches, a measure Sistemi later outlined in the same coverage.

These measures reflect Binance's acknowledgment of the systemic risks highlighted by the 2022 TerraUSD (UST) collapse, as detailed in a ScienceDirect study (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612322005359).

Post-Terra Risk Management: Binance vs. Competitors

Binance's approach contrasts with Coinbase and Kraken's strategies. Coinbase, which co-founded the U.S. Dollar Coin (USDC), leverages regulatory compliance as its primary risk mitigation tool-an orientation noted in a Forbes analysis (https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2025/06/23/is-coinbase-primed-for-growth-after-landmark-stablecoin-vote/). The platform's recent Senate-backed stablecoin regulation bill mandates full reserve backing and monthly audits, aligning with its FDIC-insured USD balances for U.S. users. Meanwhile, Kraken's USDG stablecoin, fully backed by cash and cash equivalents, emphasizes transparency through monthly audits and regulatory oversight, per Kraken's announcement (https://blog.kraken.com/news/introducing-usdg-a-new-era-in-stablecoins).

Binance, however, has opted for a hybrid model. While it maintains $31 billion in

and reserves with a public Proof-of-Reserves (PoR) system, its support for externally developed stablecoins like USDe underscores a focus on innovation over caution. This duality-prioritizing growth while addressing systemic risks-mirrors the broader industry tension between scalability and stability.

Expert Evaluations: Sufficient Accountability?

A 2025 Pacific-Basin Finance Journal study emphasizes the need for dynamic depeg risk models incorporating on-chain data and sentiment analysis (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926343724003925). Binance's technical adjustments align with these recommendations, but critics argue that its compensation plan remains reactive rather than preventive. For instance, the 40-minute window for payouts excludes users affected outside this period, raising questions about equitable risk distribution, as Brave New Coin observed.

Coinbase's Faryar Shirzad, meanwhile, contends that stablecoins pose minimal systemic risk to traditional banking, citing their role as payment tools rather than savings vehicles (CoinDesk coverage noted earlier). This perspective contrasts with the U.S. banking industry's warnings, highlighting the regulatory ambiguity that persists despite frameworks like the EU's MiCA and the U.S. GENIUS Act, according to the Stablecoin Insider report (https://www.stablecoininsider.com/stablecoin-industry-report-q2-2025/).

Long-Term Implications for the Industry

The USDe incident underscores the fragility of synthetic stablecoins, which rely on algorithmic mechanisms and DeFi integrations. Binance's decision to integrate USDe into its Earn program and derivatives platforms amplified its exposure, a move tracked by CryptoSlate (https://cryptoslate.com/ethenas-usde-stablecoin-surges-to-over-13b-after-binance-listing/). In contrast, Kraken's USDG and Coinbase's USDC exemplify the shift toward collateralized models, which are perceived as safer in a post-Terra world.

Regulatory clarity will be critical. The AICPA's 2025 criteria for stablecoin reporting and MiCA's algorithmic stablecoin bans signal a global push for transparency (https://www.aicpa-cima.com/news/article/aicpa-publishes-comprehensive-criteria-for-reporting-on-stablecoins). Binance's recent licensing expansions and $1 billion SAFU fund are consistent with this trend, according to The Coinomist's analysis (https://thecoinomist.com/personalities/binance-on-top-amid-global-scrutiny-and-regulations/), but ongoing legal battles with the U.S. SEC and French regulators highlight the challenges of balancing innovation with compliance.

Conclusion: A Test of Resilience

Binance's response to the USDe depeg demonstrates a maturing approach to exchange accountability, blending user compensation, technical fixes, and regulatory alignment. However, the incident also reveals the limitations of a growth-first strategy in a market still reeling from Terra's collapse. As stablecoin adoption surges-now accounting for 5% of the $287 billion market, a trend CryptoSlate documented-exchanges must prioritize proactive risk management over reactive measures. The industry's next chapter will likely be defined by how well platforms like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken navigate this balance, ensuring stability without stifling innovation.