Binance Lawsuit Highlights Crypto's Accountability Gap in Terror Financing

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Tuesday, Nov 25, 2025 10:26 am ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Binance and CZ face a U.S. lawsuit alleging $1B+ in crypto transactions for Hamas and other terror groups.

- Plaintiffs claim lax compliance, including pooled wallets and weak verification, enabled illicit funds to terror-linked accounts.

- Binance previously settled $4.3B AML violations in 2023, but plaintiffs argue operations remain unchanged post-October 7 attack.

- Critics highlight crypto platforms' technical limits in tracking transactions despite robust verification systems.

- The case raises accountability gaps in DeFi and regulatory challenges to curb illicit crypto activity.

Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) face a landmark lawsuit in the United States, accused of enabling over $1 billion in cryptocurrency transactions for Hamas and other designated terrorist groups. The lawsuit, filed in North Dakota federal court, represents 306 plaintiffs—including victims and families of Americans killed or injured in Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel. The plaintiffs allege that Binance's lax compliance practices, including pooled wallets, weak identity verification, and limited record-keeping, allowed illicit funds to flow to terror-linked accounts

.

The complaint, spanning 284 pages, details how Binance allegedly facilitated transactions for Hamas, Hezbollah, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Iran's Revolutionary Guards. It claims the exchange "deliberately" structured itself as a "safe haven for illicit activities" and that CZ directed employees to obscure user locations to evade U.S. regulators

. Specific examples include accounts linked to Ali Mohammad Alawieh, son of a Hezbollah leader, and a Palestinian Islamic Jihad operative who opened a Binance account in 2020 . Internal communications cited in the filing suggest Binance employees were aware of criminal activity, with one joking the platform should market itself as a money-laundering service .

The lawsuit builds on Binance's prior legal troubles. In 2023, the exchange settled U.S. enforcement actions over anti-money laundering (AML) violations for $4.3 billion, and CZ served four months in prison after pleading guilty to AML program failures . Despite exiting the U.S. market, Binance remains under strict oversight by the DOJ, CFTC, and FinCEN-appointed monitors, . The plaintiffs argue the exchange's operations have not meaningfully changed, with over $50 million in transactions processed for terror groups after the October 7 attack .

Binance has declined to comment on the lawsuit but maintains it complies with international sanctions laws

. Critics, however, highlight the technical limitations of crypto platforms in tracking transactions, even with robust verification systems. Mehrow Pospieszalski, founder of AmericanFortress, noted that exchanges cannot always link verified identities to blockchain addresses . The case raises broader questions about accountability in decentralized finance and the ability of regulators to curb illicit crypto activity.

The plaintiffs seek triple damages under U.S. anti-terrorism laws, which allow for such penalties if a company is found to have "substantially assisted" a designated terrorist group. A Manhattan judge previously ruled that victims "plausibly" alleged Binance aided the October 7 attackers, while another court denied the exchange's bid to move the case out of Alabama

.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet