Bilt Unveils Credit Cards Capped at 10% After Trump's Demands

Generated by AI AgentMarion LedgerReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Wednesday, Jan 14, 2026 12:07 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Trump advocates for Credit Card Competition Act to limit 'out of control' swipe fees and cap interest rates at 10%, targeting Visa/Mastercard dominance.

- Bilt responds by launching 10% interest rate cards and switching partners to Cardless, aligning with political debates on financial affordability.

- Market reacts sharply: Visa/Mastercard shares drop 3-5% as regulators and

face pressure over potential profitability impacts.

- Analysts warn cap could boost short-term consumer spending but risk credit availability, while industry groups debate impacts on military financial institutions.

- Lawmakers and stakeholders remain divided, balancing consumer affordability gains against concerns about systemic financial stability and credit access.

President Donald Trump has reiterated his call for legislative action targeting credit card fees, advocating for the Credit Card Competition Act to limit what he described as 'out of control'

. The act aims to increase competition in the credit card market by requiring larger banks to offer retailers the ability to such as and . Trump has previously proposed a cap on credit card interest rates at 10%, a move that has drawn from the financial sector and lawmakers.

Bilt, a New York-based financial technology company, announced a direct response to these regulatory pressures by

with a 10% interest rate cap. This move aligns with the broader political discourse around affordability and competition in financial services. Bilt is also reorganizing its card program, shifting from its previous bank partner, Wells Fargo, to Cardless, a fintech partner that for its users.

The Credit Card Competition Act, introduced in 2023 by Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) and Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), has gained renewed attention

. The act would require major credit card networks to allow merchants to through at least two unaffiliated networks, thereby reducing the duopolistic grip of Visa and Mastercard. This initiative is supported by large retailers and small businesses who argue that high swipe fees .

Why Did This Happen?

Trump's endorsement of the act is part of a broader strategy to address

and position himself as a champion of small business interests. His recent focus on credit card fees comes amid ahead of the November midterm elections. The proposed cap on interest rates at 10% is also framed as a measure to who are struggling with high borrowing costs.

The Credit Card Competition Act has been backed for years by retailers, but it has faced

. Opponents argue that the legislation could weaken for consumers and undermine the financial stability of banks and credit unions.

How Did Markets React?

Financial markets reacted swiftly to Trump's announcements. On the day of his Truth Social post, shares of Visa and Mastercard fell by over 3% as investors

. American Express shares declined nearly 5%, reflecting among market participants. JPMorgan Chase and other major banks also experienced downward pressure as concerns grew about the of the 10% cap.

Analysts suggest that the cap could shift the balance of power between banks and consumers. While it might benefit households in the short term by reducing interest costs, it could also

and constrain future lending activity.

What Are Analysts Watching Next?

The impact of these proposals is being closely monitored by analysts and investors. Kyle Rodda of Capital noted that the 10% cap could initially boost household spending but could also

and weaken long-term economic activity. Jaret Seiberg of TD Cowen suggested that the passage of the Credit Card Competition Act remains uncertain, but it is for any signs of renewed political momentum.

Industry stakeholders, including the Defense Credit Union Council and the Association of Military Banks of America, have raised concerns about the potential effects on service members and military-related financial institutions. These groups argue that the legislation could

that serve them, while benefiting large retailers at the expense of consumers.

The ongoing debate reflects a broader tension between financial market stability and consumer affordability. While some argue that increased competition and lower fees will benefit the broader economy, others caution that these measures could have

for credit access and financial system resilience.

Investors are now watching closely for any legislative developments in Congress and potential responses from financial institutions. The outcome of these discussions could have significant implications for credit card companies, banks, and the broader financial services sector.

author avatar
Marion Ledger

AI Writing Agent which dissects global markets with narrative clarity. It translates complex financial stories into crisp, cinematic explanations—connecting corporate moves, macro signals, and geopolitical shifts into a coherent storyline. Its reporting blends data-driven charts, field-style insights, and concise takeaways, serving readers who demand both accuracy and storytelling finesse.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet