BHP Class Action Lawsuit: Top Lawyer Tom Goodhead Steps Down Ahead of Ruling
ByAinvest
Thursday, Aug 7, 2025 5:27 pm ET1min read
BHP--
The High Court is expected to deliver its judgment on the legal battle between Pogust Goodhead and BHP, which has been ongoing since 2015. Pogust Goodhead alleges that BHP and its joint venture partner, Vale, have engaged in an unlawful conspiracy to deny the law firm its rightful legal fees. The firm claims that the companies structured the massive compensation settlement in Brazil in a way that effectively cut out Pogust Goodhead and its clients from the fee process.
BHP, however, firmly denies the allegations, stating that the fee litigation is "entirely without merit." The company has vowed to vigorously contest all allegations and has not commented on the specifics of the case.
The case has significant implications for the mining industry and the legal profession. It highlights the challenges of recovering legal fees in global settlements, particularly when parallel actions are underway. The ruling could set a precedent for how multinational corporations and global class action law firms negotiate legal fees when compensation deals are reached outside the jurisdiction where the original representation contract exists.
The outcome of the High Court ruling will be closely watched by investors and financial professionals, as it could impact the reputation and governance of BHP and other mining firms. The case also underscores the importance of robust legal fee structures and the need for transparency in global compensation settlements.
References:
[1] https://www.ainvest.com/news/assessing-financial-legal-risks-mining-megacorporations-bhp-vale-31-7-billion-fund-dam-settlement-2508/
[2] https://www.lawfuel.com/pogust-goodhead-fires-back-at-bhp-fees-claim/
VALE--
Tom Goodhead, the chief executive of London-based Pogust Goodhead, has stepped down from his role ahead of a critical ruling from the High Court regarding the firm's £36bn class-action lawsuit against Anglo-Australian mining giant BHP. Alicia Alinia, the firm's chief operating officer, has taken over as CEO. The lawsuit concerns the collapse of the Samarco dam in Brazil in 2015, which killed 19 people and contaminated waterways and land.
Tom Goodhead, the chief executive of London-based Pogust Goodhead, has stepped down from his role ahead of a critical ruling from the High Court regarding the firm's £36bn class-action lawsuit against Anglo-Australian mining giant BHP. Alicia Alinia, the firm's chief operating officer, has taken over as CEO. The lawsuit concerns the collapse of the Samarco dam in Brazil in 2015, which killed 19 people and contaminated waterways and land.The High Court is expected to deliver its judgment on the legal battle between Pogust Goodhead and BHP, which has been ongoing since 2015. Pogust Goodhead alleges that BHP and its joint venture partner, Vale, have engaged in an unlawful conspiracy to deny the law firm its rightful legal fees. The firm claims that the companies structured the massive compensation settlement in Brazil in a way that effectively cut out Pogust Goodhead and its clients from the fee process.
BHP, however, firmly denies the allegations, stating that the fee litigation is "entirely without merit." The company has vowed to vigorously contest all allegations and has not commented on the specifics of the case.
The case has significant implications for the mining industry and the legal profession. It highlights the challenges of recovering legal fees in global settlements, particularly when parallel actions are underway. The ruling could set a precedent for how multinational corporations and global class action law firms negotiate legal fees when compensation deals are reached outside the jurisdiction where the original representation contract exists.
The outcome of the High Court ruling will be closely watched by investors and financial professionals, as it could impact the reputation and governance of BHP and other mining firms. The case also underscores the importance of robust legal fee structures and the need for transparency in global compensation settlements.
References:
[1] https://www.ainvest.com/news/assessing-financial-legal-risks-mining-megacorporations-bhp-vale-31-7-billion-fund-dam-settlement-2508/
[2] https://www.lawfuel.com/pogust-goodhead-fires-back-at-bhp-fees-claim/
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue
Comments
No comments yet