Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: AMD vs. Marvell Technology

As the artificial intelligence (AI) market continues to grow, investors are increasingly looking for companies that can capitalize on this trend. Two semiconductor giants, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Marvell Technology (MRVL), have emerged as strong contenders in the AI space. This article compares their AI-focused product roadmaps, use cases, and financial performances to help investors make informed decisions.



AMD's AI-focused product roadmap is well-established and diversified, with a strong presence in data centers for training and inferencing AI models. Its Radeon Instinct and Radeon PRO V-series GPUs, along with EPYC server microprocessors, cater to various AI workloads. AMD's data center segment grew by 80% year-over-year in Q1 2024, driven by AI demand. However, AMD's broader business makeup and smaller workforce dedicated to GPUs compared to Nvidia may limit its outperformance in the GPU-specific markets.

Marvell Technology, on the other hand, is gaining traction with its custom HBM compute architecture, targeting cloud AI accelerators. Its data center segment surged in Q3'25, with a 98% increase driven by AI demand. Marvell's role in helping tech titans create their own data center chips has boosted its revenue and valuation. However, Marvell's data center revenue was not explicitly stated, making it difficult to directly compare with AMD's data center segment.



Both AMD and Marvell Technology have strong analyst ratings, with AMD at a 12-month stock price forecast of $195.45 and Marvell at $111.07. However, AMD's forward PE ratio of 49 times earnings is higher than Marvell's 47.38 times earnings, indicating a greater premium for AMD's stock.

In conclusion, while both AMD and Marvell Technology have strong AI-focused product roadmaps, AMD's established presence and diversified portfolio make it a better choice for investors looking to capitalize on the AI market. However, Marvell Technology's custom HBM compute architecture and strong AI demand-driven growth make it an attractive option for those seeking a more focused AI play. Ultimately, investors should consider their risk tolerance and investment goals when deciding between these two semiconductor giants in the AI space.