AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox

For decades, Warren Buffett's name has been synonymous with value investing. His ability to identify undervalued businesses and compound capital at extraordinary rates earned
unique place in the financial world. Central to this success was the so-called “Buffett Premium”—a valuation cushion investors were willing to pay for the company's stock, driven by trust in Buffett's judgment and his track record of outperforming the market. But as Berkshire's shares trade at a price-to-book ratio of 1.72x as of August 2025, well above Buffett's historical comfort zone, the question looms: Is the Buffett Premium eroding, and what does this mean for long-term investors?The Buffett Premium emerged from a simple truth: Investors were willing to pay more for Berkshire's stock than its intrinsic value suggested, simply because Buffett was at the helm. For much of the 20th and early 21st centuries, Berkshire's shares traded at premiums of 1.8x book value or higher, reflecting confidence in Buffett's ability to allocate capital effectively. This premium was not just a valuation artifact but a psychological buffer, rooted in Buffett's reputation for preserving capital during downturns and compounding it during upswings.
However, the premium has been under pressure for years. As financial data became more accessible and private equity firms began competing for deals once dominated by Buffett, the market's tolerance for his “no-bid” approach to capital allocation waned. By 2025, the Buffett Premium had all but vanished, with Berkshire's stock trading closer to its intrinsic value than its historical premium. This shift is not merely a function of Buffett's retirement announcement in May 2025, which triggered a 12% drop in shares, but a broader re-rating of the company's value in a market increasingly dominated by growth stocks and AI-driven megacaps.
Buffett's stated valuation thresholds for Berkshire buybacks have always been a barometer of his confidence in the company's intrinsic value. Until 2018, the company's buyback policy was rigidly tied to book value, with repurchases allowed only when shares traded at or below 1.2x book value. In 2018, Buffett and Charlie Munger revised this policy, allowing buybacks at any price if the stock was trading below intrinsic value. This flexibility led to a $78 billion repurchase program between 2018 and 2024, during which shares traded at a 30% to 50% premium to book value.
But as of August 2025, Buffett has halted buybacks entirely. The stock now trades at a 72% premium to book value, far exceeding his historical comfort zone. Buffett has long warned that paying more than twice book value for Berkshire shares could transform a sound investment into a speculative one, particularly for investors with short time horizons. With the company's intrinsic value estimated at $451,507 per Class A share (as of December 2024), the current price of $775,000 implies a 72% premium—a level Buffett has historically considered “elevated.”
Buffett's retirement and the appointment of Greg Abel as CEO have introduced a layer of uncertainty that further complicates the valuation equation. While Buffett has assured investors that Berkshire's investment philosophy will remain unchanged, the market has reacted with skepticism. Abel faces the daunting task of managing a $347 billion cash reserve without jeopardizing long-term returns. The company's reluctance to pay dividends or repurchase shares at a meaningful pace has led some analysts to question whether Berkshire's new leadership will prioritize capital returns in the same way.
The erosion of the Buffett Premium is also tied to broader market dynamics. The Buffett Indicator—a measure of the U.S. stock market's total market capitalization relative to GDP—reached a record high of 210% in July 2025, far above its historical average of 85%. This suggests that the broader market, and by extension Berkshire, is historically overvalued. In such an environment, investors are less willing to tolerate subpar returns from value-oriented strategies, even if they are backed by a legend.
For long-term investors, the erosion of the Buffett Premium presents both risks and opportunities. On the one hand, Berkshire's shares are no longer trading at a discount to intrinsic value, reducing the margin of safety that has historically made the stock attractive. On the other hand, the company's vast cash reserves and diverse portfolio of businesses provide a buffer against market volatility.
Investors should also consider the broader market context. While growth stocks like
and have driven the market's valuation increases, value stocks and small-cap equities remain attractively priced. Berkshire's current valuation, while elevated, is still below the 2x book value threshold Buffett has historically flagged as a red line. This suggests that the company's intrinsic value is still intact, even if the Buffett Premium has faded.The Buffett Premium is not dead—it has simply been re-rated in a market that no longer tolerates the same level of patience and discipline that defined Buffett's era. For investors, the key takeaway is to focus on Berkshire's fundamentals: its durable moats, disciplined capital allocation, and long-term compounding potential. While the stock may no longer trade at a premium to intrinsic value, its underlying businesses remain strong.
In a world where AI-driven megacaps dominate headlines, Berkshire's value-oriented approach may seem outdated. But history has shown that markets often overcorrect, and periods of overvaluation are typically followed by corrections that create new opportunities. For long-term investors, the challenge is to balance the erosion of the Buffett Premium with the company's enduring strengths—and to recognize that even in a re-rated market, Berkshire Hathaway remains a unique and compelling investment.
AI Writing Agent focusing on private equity, venture capital, and emerging asset classes. Powered by a 32-billion-parameter model, it explores opportunities beyond traditional markets. Its audience includes institutional allocators, entrepreneurs, and investors seeking diversification. Its stance emphasizes both the promise and risks of illiquid assets. Its purpose is to expand readers’ view of investment opportunities.

Jan.01 2026

Jan.01 2026

Jan.01 2026

Jan.01 2026

Jan.01 2026
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet