Berkshire Hathaway, Coca-Cola, and Other Companies Resist Anti-DEI Movement Amid Shareholder Battles
ByAinvest
Sunday, May 11, 2025 7:00 am ET1min read
AAPL--
This trend is a stark contrast to the White House's recent cuts to DEI programs, which have saved the federal government $2.3 billion, including nearly $800 million from the Department of Education alone [2]. The Trump administration has argued that DEI initiatives divide Americans and are not aligned with the administration's goals of enhancing government efficiency.
However, some companies are arguing that DEI leads to greater financial and patient outcomes, generating shareholder value. For instance, Bristol Myers Squibb has maintained its DEI efforts, stating that they contribute to better financial and patient outcomes [1].
The mixed signals from shareholder votes and company policies suggest a complex landscape for DEI in the corporate world. While some shareholders are pushing for a reduction in DEI programs, many companies continue to see the value in these initiatives. This dynamic highlights the ongoing debate and the need for further clarity on the role of DEI in corporate governance and shareholder value creation.
References:
[1] https://news.wttw.com/2025/02/18/donald-trump-administration-gives-schools-2-weeks-end-dei-programs-or-risk-losing
[2] https://thenationaldesk.com/news/politics/white-house-reports-2-point-3-billion-savings-from-dei-program-cuts-diversity-epa-education-state-department
BMY--
DEI--
KO--
Despite President Trump's executive orders and several companies rolling back their DEI programs, anti-DEI shareholder votes at companies like Coca-Cola and Apple have failed to gain traction. Proposals asking companies to cease DEI efforts have been rejected by 97% of shareholders, with only 1% supporting them. Companies like Bristol Myers Squibb argue that DEI leads to greater financial and patient outcomes, generating shareholder value.
Despite President Trump's executive orders and several companies rolling back their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, anti-DEI shareholder votes at prominent corporations like Coca-Cola and Apple have largely failed to gain traction. Proposals asking companies to cease DEI efforts were rejected by 97% of shareholders, with only 1% supporting them [1].This trend is a stark contrast to the White House's recent cuts to DEI programs, which have saved the federal government $2.3 billion, including nearly $800 million from the Department of Education alone [2]. The Trump administration has argued that DEI initiatives divide Americans and are not aligned with the administration's goals of enhancing government efficiency.
However, some companies are arguing that DEI leads to greater financial and patient outcomes, generating shareholder value. For instance, Bristol Myers Squibb has maintained its DEI efforts, stating that they contribute to better financial and patient outcomes [1].
The mixed signals from shareholder votes and company policies suggest a complex landscape for DEI in the corporate world. While some shareholders are pushing for a reduction in DEI programs, many companies continue to see the value in these initiatives. This dynamic highlights the ongoing debate and the need for further clarity on the role of DEI in corporate governance and shareholder value creation.
References:
[1] https://news.wttw.com/2025/02/18/donald-trump-administration-gives-schools-2-weeks-end-dei-programs-or-risk-losing
[2] https://thenationaldesk.com/news/politics/white-house-reports-2-point-3-billion-savings-from-dei-program-cuts-diversity-epa-education-state-department

Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet