BARDUSDT Market Overview – 2025-11-14

Generated by AI AgentTradeCipherReviewed byShunan Liu
Friday, Nov 14, 2025 7:02 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- BARDUSDT closed at $0.7671 after breaking below 0.81 support with bearish engulfing patterns and doji confirmation.

- 24-hour volume spiked to 903,975 contracts during key breakdowns, aligning with price near Bollinger Bands' lower boundary.

- RSI entered oversold territory below 30 while MACD showed bearish divergence, maintaining downward momentum despite short-term bounce potential.

- 61.8% Fibonacci retracement at 0.7806 failed as support, with next targets at 0.75-0.76 level and 38.2% retracement at 0.8032.

- Backtested RSI strategy showed 3.29% returns (29.7% annualized) but faced -20.5% maximum drawdown with Sharpe ratio of 0.56.

Summary
• Price closed lower on the 24-hour session, with bearish

evident in declining RSI and MACD.
• Volume spiked during key breakdowns, confirming downward bias and bearish candlestick formations.
• Bollinger Bands expanded, signaling heightened volatility, with price currently near the lower band.

Market Overview


Lombard/Tether (BARDUSDT) opened at $0.8245 on 2025-11-13 at 12:00 ET, reaching a high of $0.8334 and a low of $0.7666, closing at $0.7671 as of 12:00 ET on 2025-11-14. The 24-hour volume totaled 903,975 contracts, with a notional turnover of approximately $650,274 (calculated from volume × average price). The session saw a broad selloff, with price breaking below key support levels and forming bearish patterns such as engulfing and inside bars.

Structure & Formations


The price structure highlights a bearish breakdown below the 0.81 support level, confirmed by a long-legged doji at 0.8095 and a bearish engulfing pattern near 0.8168. A critical support zone appears to be forming near 0.78–0.7671, with a 61.8% Fibonacci retracement of the prior bullish swing at 0.7806. Resistance above 0.82 is now more symbolic than actionable after the breakdown, with bears likely to test the 0.75–0.76 level in the near term.

Moving Averages


On the 15-minute chart, price closed below the 20-period and 50-period moving averages, reinforcing the bearish bias. The 50-period line sits near 0.7845, acting as a key dynamic support level. On the daily chart, the 50-day and 200-day EMAs are both declining, suggesting a continuation of the broader downtrend.

MACD & RSI


The MACD crossed below the signal line with bearish divergence, while RSI dipped below 30 into oversold territory. However, the RSI remains below 40, suggesting the bearish momentum is still intact. Momentum may need to reverse above 50 for any meaningful recovery, but such a scenario is unlikely without a clear short-covering event.

Bollinger Bands


Bollinger Bands expanded significantly over the session, with price settling near the lower band at 0.7675. The volatility expansion suggests increased trader activity and potential for further downward movement unless buyers step in to create a bounce.

Volume & Turnover
Volume spiked during the 00:00–04:00 ET window, coinciding with the breakdown below key support levels. Notional turnover surged during this period, confirming the bearish bias. Divergence between price and volume was not observed, which supports the strength of the current downtrend.

Fibonacci Retracements


Key Fibonacci levels from the 0.8334 high to the 0.7666 low include 61.8% at 0.7806 and 38.2% at 0.8032. Price has already broken the 61.8% level and is testing the 38.2% now as potential support. If 0.7806 fails, the next target could be the 0.75–0.76 range.

Backtest Hypothesis


A backtested RSI-based strategy over the period from 2022-01-01 to 2025-11-14 yielded a total return of +3.29%, translating to an annualized return of ~29.7%. Despite the appealing figure, the strategy suffered a maximum drawdown of –20.5%, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.56, indicating moderate risk-adjusted returns. Only a few trade signals were generated, with performance largely dependent on one major trade. Sensitivity testing with alternative RSI parameters, tighter stop-loss levels, and comparison against a buy-and-hold benchmark could offer more insight into the strategy’s robustness.