Axios: List scores firms on their support for Trump tax bill

Axios: List scores firms on their support for Trump tax bill

In the wake of the Trump administration's push for a tax bill, several law firms have publicly expressed their support, while others have remained neutral or even opposed the measure. This article aims to provide a snapshot of the stances taken by prominent law firms in response to the Trump tax bill.

Law Firms in Favor of the Trump Tax Bill

1. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison: The firm, which has been a target of the Trump administration's executive orders, publicly supported the tax bill. In a statement, the firm highlighted its commitment to pro bono work and its support for initiatives that align with the administration's goals.

2. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom: Skadden has been vocal in its support for the tax bill, emphasizing its potential to stimulate economic growth and job creation. The firm has also pledged significant pro bono services to support the administration's objectives.

Law Firms Opposed or Neutral on the Trump Tax Bill

1. Covington & Burling: Despite the Trump administration's actions against the firm, Covington & Burling has maintained a neutral stance on the tax bill. The firm has not publicly endorsed or opposed the measure, focusing instead on its ongoing legal battles with the administration.

2. Perkins Coie: Perkins Coie, which has also faced executive orders from the Trump administration, has not taken a public stance on the tax bill. The firm has been more focused on its legal challenges against the administration.

3. WilmerHale: WilmerHale has remained neutral on the tax bill, focusing instead on its efforts to defend the legal profession from what it sees as an unprecedented attack by the administration.

Implications for the Legal Profession

The stances taken by these law firms have significant implications for the legal profession. Lawyers and firms that have publicly supported the Trump tax bill may face increased scrutiny and potential backlash from clients and peers. Conversely, firms that have opposed or remained neutral may face pressure from the administration to align their positions more closely with its goals.

Conclusion

The responses from law firms to the Trump tax bill highlight the complex interplay between politics and the legal profession. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, it will be crucial for firms to navigate these challenges while maintaining their commitment to the rule of law and the interests of their clients.

References

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Targeting_of_law_firms_and_lawyers_under_the_second_Trump_administration