Axelar/Bitcoin Market Overview
• Price action remained range-bound between 1.75e-06 and 1.92e-06, with consolidation in the 1.81e-06–1.83e-06 zone.
• RSI showed no strong momentum, staying neutral around 50; MACD suggested no clear trend.
• Volatility increased briefly during the 15:00–16:00 ET period, with a 1.92e-06 high.
• Volume spiked to 13,204.04 near 15:00 ET but did not confirm a breakout.
• Price remains within a descending Bollinger Band pattern, suggesting potential for a bearish follow-through.
The Axelar/Bitcoin (AXLBTC) pair opened at 1.81e-06 on 2025-10-11 at 12:00 ET, reached a high of 1.92e-06, and a low of 1.75e-06, closing at 1.83e-06 on 2025-10-12 at 12:00 ET. Total volume across the 24-hour window was 90,729.25, with a notional turnover of 158.17e-06 BTC. The pair remained in a tight range with no decisive direction.
Structure & Formations
Price action revealed a consolidation pattern within the 1.75e-06–1.92e-06 range, with key support at 1.75e-06 and resistance at 1.83e-06. A bearish engulfing pattern occurred near 1.82e-06 at 05:00 ET, but buyers retook control by the 10:00 ET mark. No clear reversal patterns emerged during the day, but a potential test of the 1.83e-06 level may trigger another pullback. The 1.83e-06 level is a critical psychological resistance.
Moving Averages
The 20-period and 50-period moving averages on the 15-minute chart remained closely aligned, hovering just above the 1.81e-06 level, suggesting a neutral trend. On the daily chart, the 50-period MA is positioned slightly above the 100- and 200-period MAs, indicating a possible continuation of a bullish trend if the 1.83e-06 level is cleared. However, the short-term indicators remain mixed.
MACD & RSI
The MACD remained flat with a weak histogram, signaling low momentum. RSI hovered near 50 all day, indicating no strong overbought or oversold conditions. A reading slightly above 50 during the 14:30–15:00 ET period suggested mild bullish pressure, but it failed to confirm with volume. The pair remains in a balanced state with no clear direction, suggesting a potential for breakout or breakdown depending on upcoming catalysts.
Bollinger Bands
Price remained within a contracting Bollinger Band structure, tightening around the 1.81e-06–1.83e-06 zone. Volatility showed a mild increase near 15:00 ET when price touched 1.92e-06, but it quickly reverted to the middle band. A breakout above 1.83e-06 could trigger an expansion phase, while a drop below 1.75e-06 may increase downside volatility. The tight range suggests a possible consolidation ahead.
Volume & Turnover
Volume saw a significant spike of 13,204.04 during the 15:00 ET hour as price reached 1.92e-06, but it failed to break through 1.83e-06. The majority of the volume was concentrated in the 15:00–16:00 ET window. Notional turnover mirrored the volume spikes with a peak of 25.43e-06 BTC. A divergence was observed where high volume did not lead to a sustained price move, indicating possible exhaustion.
Fibonacci Retracements
On the 15-minute chart, the 50% retracement level sits at 1.82e-06, while the 61.8% level is at 1.83e-06. These levels acted as key resistance markers, with the 61.8% level being tested twice during the day. On the daily chart, a 61.8% retracement level is at 1.77e-06, which coincides with a recent support area. A test of the 61.8% level on the daily chart could lead to a retest of the 1.81e-06 level.
Backtest Hypothesis
Given the observed consolidation pattern and key Fibonacci levels, a potential backtesting strategy could involve placing a long entry near 1.81e-06 with a stop just below 1.77e-06 and a target at 1.86e-06. Alternatively, a short trade could be triggered near 1.83e-06 with a stop above 1.86e-06 and a target at 1.77e-06. This approach would capitalize on the defined support and resistance levels while managing risk within a measured range.
Decoding market patterns and unlocking profitable trading strategies in the crypto space
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.



Comments
No comments yet