AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Aster’s 24-hour trading volume reached $4.07 billion in late December 2025, outpacing other
DEX platforms like Lighter, EdgeX, and Pacifica, which . This performance positioned as a leader in a market that saw a broader drop in activity. The surge in onchain perpetual futures volume has been attributed to factors like leverage and the absence of a traditional altcoin season .The Perp DEX market has become increasingly competitive, with platforms like Hyperliquid and Aster vying for dominance. Hyperliquid, despite a recent decline in volume, maintained a 63% share of open interest in Q3 2025,
. Aster’s volume share rose to 27.7% in November 2025, though concerns arose over its 1:1 volume correlation with Binance and a delisting by DefiLlama .
Onchain perpetual futures gained traction as traders sought leverage and exposure without expiration dates. Decentralized platforms like Aster and Hyperliquid
by late 2025. The competition among platforms is , liquidity depth, and infrastructure reliability.Aster’s 24-hour volume of $4.07 billion in late December 2025 outperformed platforms like Lighter, EdgeX, and Pacifica, which
. This performance reflects a shift in trader activity toward platforms with deeper liquidity and faster execution. While Lighter , overtaking Hyperliquid’s $21.5 billion, its overall 24-hour volume dropped, signaling ongoing challenges in retaining traders. Meanwhile, Hyperliquid recorded a slight increase in open interest, though its overall volume declined.The broader Perp DEX market experienced a drop in activity, with many platforms reporting lower figures. Aster’s volume, however, remained a standout,
as an alternative to spot markets.Hyperliquid has dominated the Perp DEX space in terms of open interest,
. This figure far outpaced Aster’s 27.7% and Lighter’s 10% volume share. The alignment between total value locked (TVL) and open interest (OI) is a key metric for assessing capital efficiency. Hyperliquid’s $66.7 billion in OI in December 2025, compared to its $41.6 billion TVL, highlights its strong capital efficiency .Aster, while trailing in TVL, reported the highest OI at $2.53 billion. However, concerns over the authenticity of its volume persist due to its 1:1 correlation with Binance and DefiLlama’s delisting
. Lighter, with a TVL of $1.46 billion and OI of $1.67 billion, demonstrated closer alignment between these metrics but trailed Hyperliquid significantly. For investors, the key differentiator lies in capital efficiency and market credibility .The rise of onchain perpetual futures has been a major trend in 2025,
. Traders are increasingly favoring perps for their leverage and 24/7 trading access. Platforms like Aster and Hyperliquid are at the forefront of this shift, with infrastructure improvements and aggressive liquidity incentives driving adoption. Aster’s focus on multi-chain support and high leverage appeals to retail traders, while Hyperliquid’s institutional-grade order books and capital efficiency attract professional participants .Lighter’s zero-knowledge infrastructure and zero-fee model have drawn institutional interest but have yet to match Hyperliquid’s TVL or OI. Its recent outage in October 2025 raised concerns about reliability
. As the perp DEX market matures, the competition for volume and capital efficiency will likely intensify, , liquidity, and system reliability over ideological preferences.Aster’s strong performance in 2025 highlights the maturation of onchain trading platforms and the growing importance of capital efficiency and liquidity depth. As the sector evolves, traders will continue to prioritize execution and reliability over ideology
.Blending traditional trading wisdom with cutting-edge cryptocurrency insights.

Dec.30 2025

Dec.30 2025

Dec.30 2025

Dec.30 2025

Dec.30 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet