Aster's Surge Shakes Hyperliquid's Crypto Dominance

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Thursday, Sep 25, 2025 2:14 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Crypto markets face massive liquidations, with Ethereum and Hyperliquid among hardest-hit assets amid macroeconomic pressures and shifting institutional sentiment.

- Hyperliquid’s on-chain perpetuals market share dropped from 71% to 38% as rivals Aster (14.9%) and Lighter (16.8%) gained traction via tokenomics and multi-chain strategies.

- Aster’s ASTER token surged 2,100% while Hyperliquid’s HYPE fell 15%, reflecting competitive dynamics and whale activity shifting from staking to centralized exchanges.

- Ethereum’s price dropped 14.51% to $43.10 as network fees and hedging demand collapsed, signaling broader market weakness and capital flight to Bitcoin.

- Analysts highlight structural risks for Hyperliquid despite buyback advantages, while Aster’s TVL surge and regulatory uncertainties shape crypto’s volatile future.

Massive liquidations across crypto markets have intensified, with

(ETH) emerging as one of the most affected assets. The sell-off has been driven by a combination of macroeconomic pressures, shifting institutional sentiment, and fierce competition in the decentralized perpetuals market, where platforms like Aster and Lighter are challenging Hyperliquid’s dominance.

Hyperliquid, once commanding 71% of the on-chain perpetuals market in May 2025, now holds just 38% of trading volumes, according to Dune Analytics user @uwusanauwutitle1[1]. Rivals such as Binance Labs-backed Aster and a16z-backed Lighter have surged to 14.9% and 16.8% market shares, respectively, fueled by aggressive tokenomics, multi-chain strategies, and leverage offerings. Aster’s native token, ASTER, has soared over 2,100% in a week, reaching $1.97, while Hyperliquid’s HYPE token has fallen nearly 15% in the same periodtitle4[4].

Ethereum’s struggles reflect broader market weakness. Institutional and whale activity has shifted from staking to centralized exchanges, increasing supply and exacerbating selling pressure. Ethereum’s price has dropped 14.51% weekly, trading at $43.10 as of September 24, 2025title5[5]. Network fees have plummeted to 0.17 Gwei, signaling subdued on-chain activity. Meanwhile, Ethereum’s options market shows mixed signals: call options are regaining premiums, but hedging demand has collapsed, suggesting uncertainty about near-term directiontitle6[6].

The on-chain perpetuals market itself has seen a dramatic shift. Aster’s 24-hour trading volume surpassed Hyperliquid’s for the first time, reaching $24.7 billion compared to Hyperliquid’s $10.7 billiontitle2[2]. This surge was driven by Binance Chain’s gas fee reductions and CZ’s endorsement, which boosted Aster’s total value locked (TVL) to $1.85 billion—a 196% increase from $625 million in a weektitle9[8]. Hyperliquid, however, retains a larger liquidity pool, with $300 billion in 30-day volumes versus Aster’s $27 billiontitle4[4].

The broader crypto market remains under pressure.

(BTC) fell to $114,000 after the Fed’s 25-basis-point rate cut, with weekly trading volumes dropping 23% to $43.7 billiontitle6[6]. Altcoin momentum, as measured by the Altseason Index, has collapsed from 100 to 67, reflecting capital flight to Bitcoin. Analysts attribute the selloff to profit-taking, inflation concerns, and waning institutional ETF inflows.

Hyperliquid’s challenges extend beyond market share. A major whale holding 1.8 million HYPE tokens (worth $80 million) recently sold 201,900 tokens ($8.93 million) to Aster, signaling diversification amid volatilitytitle5[5]. This move aligns with broader uncertainty about Hyperliquid’s ability to retain users as competitors innovate with yield-bearing collateral and real-world asset (RWA) perpetuals.

Despite the bearish backdrop, some analysts see potential for a rebound. Ethereum’s price appears near a critical support level at $42.89, with technical indicators suggesting a possible rally to $55 if buyers hold. However, a breakdown below $39.85 could trigger deeper declinestitle5[5]. For Hyperliquid, its 97% fee allocation to a buyback fund and lean tokenomics offer a structural advantage, but regulatory risks and competition from multi-chain rivals remain significant headwinds.