AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox



$ASTER’s $10 billion valuation has ignited intense debate in the crypto market, with critics labeling it one of the most significant instances of token supply manipulation in recent history. On-chain data reveals that 96% of the token’s total supply is concentrated among six wallets, likely controlled by a single entity[1]. This extreme centralization, coupled with a lack of a functional product and minimal trading volume—just $500,000 daily on the
spot pair—has drawn sharp scrutiny from analysts. Prominent trader Cyclop highlighted the discrepancy, asserting that the token’s valuation is “complete garbage” and that its intrinsic value likely does not exceed $200 million[2].The token’s meteoric rise followed a September 2025 token generation event (TGE) and airdrop, which saw the price surge 1,650% within 24 hours, reaching a peak of $0.7847. The TGE generated over $310 million in trading volume and attracted 330,000 new user wallets, with total value locked (TVL) climbing to $1 billion[3]. However, these metrics contrast sharply with the token’s fundamentals. The platform, a decentralized perpetual exchange (DEX) backed by YZi Labs and endorsed by Binance’s Changpeng Zhao (CZ), lacks a working product and faces skepticism over its ability to sustain such a valuation[4].
Whale activity has further fueled concerns. A single entity transferred 50.1 million $ASTER tokens ($80.6 million) to 10 new wallets in late September, raising questions about potential distribution strategies or market manipulation[5]. Additionally, the token’s withdrawal unlock date—October 1—remains a critical risk factor. Funds currently locked until that date could trigger a liquidity crunch if early holders sell en masse[6].
The project’s tokenomics also draw criticism. While 53.5% of the 8 billion-token supply is allocated to airdrops and community rewards, the top five holders control 92.63% of the supply. Cyclop and others argue this structure incentivizes speculative trading over long-term adoption[7]. Meanwhile, the platform’s technical advancements—such as ZK-powered privacy features and hidden orders—have been praised for institutional-grade utility, but these innovations have not offset concerns about centralization[8].
Market analysts remain divided. Bullish observers point to Binance’s CZ backing, multi-chain expansion, and institutional-grade tools as catalysts for growth[9]. Skeptics, however, emphasize the project’s valuation disconnect with competitors like Hyperliquid, which holds a 2.7x TVL advantage[10]. Technical analysis suggests $0.74 as a key resistance level, with a breakdown below $0.60 potentially triggering panic selling as the October 1 unlock approaches[11].
The controversy underscores broader challenges in crypto markets, where narrative-driven valuations often overshadow fundamentals. While $ASTER’s proponents highlight its role in decentralized trading innovation, critics warn that its concentrated supply and lack of product-market fit could lead to a dramatic correction.
Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet