Arm's AI Push Fails to Lift Stock as $670M Volume Ranks 152nd on U.S. Exchanges

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Tuesday, Sep 23, 2025 8:31 pm ET1min read
ARM--
ETC--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Arm Holdings (ARM) fell 2.42% on 9/23/2025 with $670M volume, ranking 152th among U.S. stocks.

- Mixed market sentiment reflected concerns over macroeconomic risks and delayed adoption of Arm's next-gen AI chip architectures.

- Institutional buying waned while retail investors maintained caution, despite analysts highlighting long-term growth potential in AI licensing.

- Technical indicators signaled near-term volatility, with upcoming earnings and partnership updates seen as critical directional catalysts.

On September 23, 2025, , ranking 152nd among U.S.-listed equities. The stock's performance followed mixed signals from market participants assessing its competitive positioning in the semiconductor sector.

Recent developments highlighted Arm's strategic focus on expanding its , with analysts noting potential long-term growth catalysts. However, short-term pressure emerged from concerns over macroeconomic headwinds and delayed client adoption of next-generation architectures. Institutional activity showed reduced buying interest compared to prior quarters, while retail investor sentiment remained cautiously positioned.

revealed key resistance levels near critical moving averages, with momentum indicators suggesting continued volatility in the near term. emphasized the importance of upcoming earnings releases and partnership announcements as pivotal factors for near-term directionality.

To run this back-test robustly I need to lock down a few practical details: 1. Universe • Do you want all U.S.-listed common stocks (NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX) ranked by that day’s dollar trading volume? • Or a specific sub-universe (e.g., S&P 500 constituents, Russell 3000, China A-shares, etc.)? 2. Weighting & re-balance mechanics • Equal-weight each of the 500 names bought every day and sell them entirely the next day (i.e., a one-day holding period)? • Any transaction-cost or slippage assumption you would like to include? 3. Data caveats • Minute-level fill prices are not available; the standard approach is buy at next day’s open (or same-day close) and sell at the following close / open. Which convention do you prefer? If the default choices below work for you, just let me know and I’ll start the job: • Universe: All U.S. exchange-listed common stocks • Entry price: same-day close, exit price: next-day close • Equal weight across top-500 names each day • No transaction costs or slippage Feel free to adjust any of those parameters and I’ll proceed with the back-test.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet