Applied Materials 1.29 Billion Dollar Volume Slides to 65th as Regulatory Delays and Short Sellers Weigh on Shares

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Monday, Sep 8, 2025 9:29 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Applied Materials (AMAT) saw $1.29B trading volume on Sept 8, 2025, ranking 65th, with shares down 0.43% due to regulatory delays in its semiconductor etching tech.

- Regulatory review delays for its new etching tech have postponed client trials, raising concerns over Q4 revenue visibility and high-volume manufacturing orders.

- Short interest rose 12% in two weeks, indicating bearish sentiment, while institutional block trades accounted for 34% of volume, showing active position management.

- Technical indicators showed mixed signals: the stock remains above its 50-day moving average, but bearish divergence in on-balance volume patterns emerged.

On September 8, 2025, , ranking 65th in the market.

Recent corporate announcements highlighted potential operational risks. A pending regulatory review of the company’s new has delayed key client trials, raising concerns about near-term revenue visibility. Analysts noted this could impact Q4 order pipelines for high-volume manufacturing clients

Market participants observed subtle shifts in institutional positioning. , suggesting growing bearish conviction among . This contrasts with broader tech sector strength,

Technical indicators showed mixed signals. While the stock remains above its , bearish divergence emerged in patterns. , indicating active position management by

To run this back-test accurately we need to nail down a few practical details first: 1. Universe • Do you want to scan all listed U.S. common shares (NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX), or a different market? • ADRs, ETFs, preferreds etc. excluded? 2. Weighting & execution price • Equal-weight each of the 500 names? • Buy at today’s close and liquidate at tomorrow’s close (1-day holding period), or some other execution rule? 3. Rebalancing costs • Should we assume zero transaction costs and slippage, or would you like to include a round-trip cost (e.g. 2 bpBP-- per side)? 4. Feasible approximation The current back-testing engine works ticker-by-ticker. To mimic a 500-stock daily-rotating basket we’ll need to: • Build the daily list of top-volume names, • Calculate an equal-weight basket return, • Feed that series into the engine as a synthetic “ticker”. I can automate that, but please confirm the assumptions above before I start pulling and merging several hundred thousand data points

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet