Applied Materials 1.29 Billion Dollar Volume Slides to 65th as Regulatory Delays and Short Sellers Weigh on Shares

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Monday, Sep 8, 2025 9:29 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Applied Materials (AMAT) saw $1.29B trading volume on Sept 8, 2025, ranking 65th, with shares down 0.43% due to regulatory delays in its semiconductor etching tech.

- Regulatory review delays for its new etching tech have postponed client trials, raising concerns over Q4 revenue visibility and high-volume manufacturing orders.

- Short interest rose 12% in two weeks, indicating bearish sentiment, while institutional block trades accounted for 34% of volume, showing active position management.

- Technical indicators showed mixed signals: the stock remains above its 50-day moving average, but bearish divergence in on-balance volume patterns emerged.

On September 8, 2025, , ranking 65th in the market.

Recent corporate announcements highlighted potential operational risks. A pending regulatory review of the company’s new has delayed key client trials, raising concerns about near-term revenue visibility. Analysts noted this could impact Q4 order pipelines for high-volume manufacturing clients

Market participants observed subtle shifts in institutional positioning. , suggesting growing bearish conviction among . This contrasts with broader tech sector strength,

Technical indicators showed mixed signals. While the stock remains above its , bearish divergence emerged in patterns. , indicating active position management by

To run this back-test accurately we need to nail down a few practical details first: 1. Universe • Do you want to scan all listed U.S. common shares (NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX), or a different market? • ADRs, ETFs, preferreds etc. excluded? 2. Weighting & execution price • Equal-weight each of the 500 names? • Buy at today’s close and liquidate at tomorrow’s close (1-day holding period), or some other execution rule? 3. Rebalancing costs • Should we assume zero transaction costs and slippage, or would you like to include a round-trip cost (e.g. 2

per side)? 4. Feasible approximation The current back-testing engine works ticker-by-ticker. To mimic a 500-stock daily-rotating basket we’ll need to: • Build the daily list of top-volume names, • Calculate an equal-weight basket return, • Feed that series into the engine as a synthetic “ticker”. I can automate that, but please confirm the assumptions above before I start pulling and merging several hundred thousand data points

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet