Apple Seeks Halt to App Store Ruling, Citing Irreparable Harm
1min read Apple Inc. has requested the U.S. federal appeals court to temporarily halt the execution of key provisions from a recent ruling. This ruling, issued on April 30, mandates Apple to open its App Store to more competitors, a move that Apple argues would cause irreparable harm to its business operations.
In a filing submitted to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, Apple contends that the ruling interferes with its ability to control core aspects of its business. The ruling in question arises from a 2020 antitrust lawsuit filed by Epic Games, the creator of the popular online video game Fortnite. Epic Games alleges that Apple's practices violate antitrust laws, and the recent ruling found Apple in contempt of court for defying previous orders related to the case.
Apple specifically challenges two key provisions of the ruling. The first prohibits Apple from charging a 27% fee on app purchases made outside of its App Store. The second prevents Apple from restricting developers from placing purchase links outside of the app. Apple argues that these provisions effectively force the company to provide its products and services for free, which is not legally permissible.
Epic Games has responded to Apple's motion by criticizing it as a desperate attempt to obstruct competition and maintain high fees at the expense of consumers and developers. Epic Games asserts that Apple has been trying to delay the implementation of the injunction since it was issued last week. The main judge, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, has ordered that the ruling be executed immediately and without negotiation, emphasizing that Apple cannot delay or ignore the execution, even if it chooses to appeal the decision.
This legal battle between Apple and Epic Games highlights the broader debate over app distribution and the control that tech giants exert over their platforms. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the tech industry, potentially setting precedents for how app stores operate and how developers interact with these platforms. The ongoing dispute underscores the complex interplay between innovation, competition, and regulatory oversight in the digital age.
