AMD Ranks 7th in $11.9B Volume but Shares Plunge 6.58% as AI Rivals and Analysts Weigh In

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Friday, Sep 5, 2025 9:49 pm ET1min read
AMD--
NVDA--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- AMD’s stock plunged 6.58% amid a 132% surge in $11.9B trading volume, driven by Seaport Research downgrading it to "Neutral" over AI growth concerns.

- Rival Broadcom’s $10B OpenAI chip deal and U.S. import tariffs heightened sector-wide uncertainties, pressuring AMD’s fabless business model.

- A weak jobs report and geopolitical risks exposed AMD’s reliance on foundries, despite strong Q2 AI accelerator sales but trailing Nvidia.

On September 5, 2025, , , ranking seventh in market activity. , reflecting significant investor caution amid sector-wide pressures.

The sell-off was primarily driven by a downgrade from , . Supply chain checks indicated challenges in expanding orders for AI chips, compounding existing uncertainties. Meanwhile, , signaling a shift toward in-house processor development among tech giants like Alphabet and AmazonAMZN--.

Broader market dynamics also weighed on sentiment. The U.S. administration’s announcement of potential on semiconductorON-- imports for companies not relocating production to the U.S. added regulatory risk. Additionally, , prompting profit-taking in the AI-driven growth sector. AMD’s fabless business model, reliant on foundries like , left it exposed to both margin pressures and geopolitical shifts.

Despite a strong second-quarter performance in Instinct Mi350 AI accelerators, AMDAMD-- remains a distant second to NvidiaNVDA-- in the AI GPU market. . However, , high-reward play for investors.

To run this back-test rigorously I need to pin down a few practical details: 1. Stock universeUPC-- • Should we use all primary-listed U.S. common shares (≈4,000 names), the Russell 3000, or another specific list? 2. Trade execution convention • Rank stocks by the prior day’s total dollar volume, then open positions at the next day’s open and close them at that day’s close (a 1-day holding period)? • Or rank and transactTACT-- at the same day’s close, exiting at the next day’s close? 3. Slippage / transaction costs • Apply none (pure theoretical return) or include a per-trade cost? If the above defaults (U.S. common shares, buy next-day open, sell same-day close, zero costs) are acceptable, let me know and I’ll launch the data pull and back-test. Otherwise feel free to adjust any of the points.

Busque esos activos que tengan un volumen de transacciones muy alto.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet