Alibaba's 8.45% Plunge Sends $8.08B Trade Volume to 11th in U.S. Markets Amid Regulatory Pressures

On October 10, 2025, Alibaba Group (BABA) closed with an 8.45% decline, marking one of the largest single-day drops in its recent history. The stock traded with a volume of $8.08 billion, a 118.66% increase from the previous day’s volume and ranking 11th in overall market activity. The sharp selloff coincided with broader market volatility but was amplified by specific regulatory and operational developments tied to the company.

Recent reports highlighted ongoing scrutiny from Chinese regulators regarding antitrust enforcement and data governance practices. While no new enforcement actions were announced, analysts noted heightened sensitivity among investors to potential policy shifts. Additionally, mixed signals emerged from Alibaba’s recent corporate communications, with management emphasizing long-term strategic investments while providing limited near-term revenue guidance. This ambiguity contributed to profit-taking by institutional investors ahead of quarterly earnings reports.

Technical indicators showed increased short-term pressure, with the stock breaking below key support levels. Market participants observed a divergence between Alibaba’s price action and broader e-commerce sector trends, suggesting sector-specific concerns. The company’s recent share buyback program, while still active, has not offset near-term sentiment driven by macroeconomic uncertainties and sector-specific regulatory risks.

To run this back-test accurately I need to pin down a few implementation details that aren’t fully specified yet: 1. Market universe • Do you want all U.S.–listed common stocks (NYSE + NASDAQ) or another market? 2. Volume definition • “Daily trading volume” by number of shares, or by dollar value traded? 3. Rebalancing rule • The intention is: every trading day we rank the entire universe by that day’s volume, buy an equal-weighted basket of the top 500 at that day’s close, and liquidate the whole basket at the next day’s close—correct? 4. Slippage / transaction cost assumptions • Should we include any explicit trading cost or treat the back-test as frictionless? 5. Data provider preference (if any) • Standard U.S. equity price/volume feed is fine unless you have a preference. Once I have these clarified I can generate the daily trade list, feed it into the strategy engine and return the performance statistics and charts.